What is the Reactive Power?
For a “physical” interpretation, reactive current (power/KVA flow), in my opinion is best looked at from the perspective of a generator connected directly to an infinite bus (in LV generators this is the norm).
The generator when connected to the system, “see’s/feels” the parallel impedance combination of all other generators (circa 3 ohms each) with respect to ground – which basically parallel to equate to a zero impedance in terms of restriction to any current flow out of our generator.
Post initial synchronization, the system voltage prevents currents from flowing into or out of the generator due to pressure (voltage) balance of our generator matching that of the system voltage.
If you (as the generator operator), try to lift the generator voltage, the result will only be heaps of current output flowing into the system – but with no actual extra power generated!
This is due to the fact that to achieve the extra generator voltage setpoint you desired, the generator must send out enough current into the system impedance to create the back emf required to achieve the new desired generator terminal voltage setpoint.
But because the system impedance to ground is very low (as it actually is) – then despite the extra current sent out in that fruitless attempt, the generator is near impotent to make any substantial effect on raising the “system” voltage – “fruitless” current sent out.
In a DC sense you can equate this to a small DC generator trying to lift the voltage of a load system that has a zener diode installed across that system load.
Back to the AC world, ….that current sent out in the fruitless attempt to lift system voltage must flow through the parallel low impedance of the other connected generators (each of those working against you – lowering their own generator excitation, hell bent on keeping their own same old voltage set points), thwarting our futile attempt to achieve a raise in the system voltage.
All those generators, although collectively of low impedance, compose virtually no resistance, compared to their inductive reactance. Hence all our little generators current flow – in its futile attempt to lift system volts – is virtually purely inductive.
So we have heaps of current flowing out in our attempt to lift generator volts, but because the current is 90 degrees lagging the voltage, the only power imposed on the generator prime mover is that due to the resistance of the generator windings (circa 1% of the full load current rating – hence basically un-noticeable).
Hence the physical interpretation of VAR’s, is actually simply a look at the voltage balance perspective of an electricity network. It’s the collective attempt of many parallel-connected generators to influence the system voltage – either trying to raise the voltage at a particular node (positive VAR’s) or trying to reduce the voltage at a particular node (negative VAR’s flowing back through our generator due to our attempt to lower our generator setpoint – which “lets current in”).
Reactive Power is an electrical parameter that exist in a sinusoidal (AC circuits). It maybe zero or a certain magnitude. It maybe capacitive in nature or it maybe inductive nature. In the power triangle, it is the vertical power component (plus or minus / capacitive or reactive). It may be supplied from power sending end (grid or generator) on from the power receiving end (load). A capacitor bank connected on the grid provides capacitive reactive power. An inductor bank connected on the grid provides inductive reactive power. Both of them have magnitude. Reactive power also influences the between phase angle displacement between the voltage and the current. It is power but reactive power.
Pressure switch on three phase motor
Q: Is there a way of connecting a three phase pressure control switch on a three phase motor. Also is there a three phase float switch for a three phase submersible pump i know of a single phase switch.
A: The switch only needs to have a single contact since you use a three-phase motor controller to operate the motor. The switch is wired into the low voltage contactor coil circuit to turn the motor on and off.
You can connect a pressure switch for the purpose of motor control on its low level pressure or high level pressure. It is advisable to utilize pressure switch on the control cct, and connect the contactor coils through the auxiliary NC/NO contacts depending on whether you are interested on low pressure or high pressure control. It is not good practice to allow power cct through control ccts. You don’t need a 3 phase float switch to achieve controls of a 3phase submersible pump. You should be interested in the auxiliary terminals which will allow control flexibility for low level and upper level control. A single phase float switch will give you desired result. If you are controlling more than 1 no. 3phase motors located at different places from the same pressure signal, then your 3 phase pressure switch can be employed to control the different motors separately. In addition, some terminals could be used for indication/annunciation purposes. However, a single phase pressure switch can give you all the controls you need for a 3phase motor.
How to select a breaker?
Before breaker’s selecting for your electrical system, you need to calculate value of expected short circuit current at the place of breaker’s installation. Then you need to calculate value of heat pulse and 1s current (expected value of current during one second). After that you need to calculate power of breaker and finally, after all, you can select appropriate breaker. Values of characteristics of selected breaker need to be higher from calculated values of characteristics of your power system.
You can calculate operational current of breaker using this expression:
Inp=SnT/((sqrt(3))*Un)
After that, you need to calculate expected value of surge current:
kud=1+e(-0,01/Tae)
Iud=(sqrt(2))*kud*I’
After that, you need to calculate expected value of heat impulse:
A=(sqr(I0″))*Tae*(1-e(-2*ti/Tae))+(sqr(I’))*(ti+Td”)
And finally, you need to calculate 1s current (expected value of current during 1s):
I1s=sqrt(A/1s)
So, current of interruption of your breaker and power of interruption of your breaker are:
Ii=I’
Si=(sqrt(3))*Un*Ii
Additional expressions that you can use during your calculation:
I0″=Un/((sqrt(3))*Ze”);
I”=1,1*Un/((sqrt(3))*Ze”);
I’=1,15*Un/((sqrt(3))*Ze’);
where are:
ti-time of interruption
Inp-operational current of breaker
SnT-rated power of transformer
Un-rated voltage
kud-surge coefficient
Tae-time constant of aperiodic component of short circuit current
Iud-surge current
A-heat impulse
I0″-short circuit current in subtransient period (generators are in no-load conditions)
I’-short circuit current in transient period
Td”-time constant of subtransient component of short circuit current
I1s-current during one second
Ii=expected value of current of interruption of your breaker
Si=expected value of power of interruption of your breaker
Ze”-equivalent impedance of power system in the place of fault (subtransient period)
I”-short circuit current in subtransient period (generators are in full-load conditions)
I’-short circuit current in transient period
Ze’-equivalent impedanse of power system in the place of fault (transient period)
For a branch circuit feeding a single pump, you would generally size the circuit at 125% of the pump’s full-load amperage. If you’re not using a variable frequency drive or soft starter (which have built-in overload protection), you would use a Motor-circuit protector (MCP) breaker that has both thermal and magnetic trip capability. Sizing would be according the breaker manufacturer’s recommendations for a motor of a given horsepower, but not larger than would be required to protect the circuit conductors.
“The total load of an area” is much too ambiguous to answer. If you have lighting and receptacles, you’re going to need a different type of breaker than if you have motors or mixed types of load. There is no general approach. Circuit breaker types are very specific to the application.
Safety should not be taken lightly. Installing the wrong type of breaker could result in equipment damage and/or physical harm.
There are instantaneous breakers as well as time delay breakers. For time delay breaker, for example, you go 250% maximum of the rated current based upon the HP of a motor (look in the NEC), not on the nameplate label. The nameplate current value is for overload protection. Also try to size the breaker so that the conductors are protected.
As we kn
Are variable speed drives harmful to motor?
Variable speed drive switches very fast which brings high dv/dt on motor. How often do we face with problems coming with VSD? How harmful is the common mode currents in windings and other parts of motor due to high dv/dt. Do we see winding isolation failure? How much does the life of motor reduce? Also, is the filtering of voltage at the output of inverter common or applicable practice in the field?
The waveforms for the INVERTER are not good to the motor…. Makes the motor run hot and less efficient….. and all the above….
In-line filters to reduce harmonics is a must in many cases…
Depending on power levels you can have in line reactors for CM and DM or balanced bridge methods for CM… There is methods of harmonic canceling with reactors called harmonic blockers, where you arrange the 3 phase windings in such a manner to cancel certain harmonics….not all harmonics will be blocked, usually in grouping intervals…you need to be aware of what harmonics are your worst offenders…
Mostly in medium and high voltage motor drives the very fast change of the voltage can induce high capacitive currents inside the motor with harmful results.
A way to reduce this negative effect is to increase the number of voltage steps (levels) such that the dV/dT will decrease proportionally (dT=turn on switching time, dV=one voltage step). The most popular method used is SVPWM (space vector sine PWM) NPC (neutral point clamped) multilevel frequency converter. Line L-C filters are also used for EMC.
The first step in any filter analysis is knowing what harmonic vectors your dealing with.
Mathcad is a great tool for modeling the PWM modulation with the sub carrier and generating the harmonic matrices..vectors…I usually go above the 100th harmonic in some analysis, then doing this over the operating ranges of the motor….you then pick your Worse Case operating point and now you have a matrices to work with…. Summing the harmonic magnitudes will give you an idea of how much garbage your feeding your motor windings.
They could be harmful for high frequency current and voltages which are not economical to be eliminated.
But this weakness is so neglect able to the benefits providing. These benefits are very comprehensive. The harmful harmonics are controlled by the standards, so in order to improve harmonic characteristics, we need an improved standard.
Lighting control panel to distribution board
There are a couple of construction differences which may be present, depending on the style of “lighting control panel”.
First, a distribution board typically has poly-phase branch breakers with the intention of feeding either other sub-panels or large loads — such as a motor with a motor controller.
A lighting control panel will have mostly single-pole breakers with phase-to-neutral branch circuits feeding lighting circuitry. There is the added possibility of having either ‘smart’ breakers or integral contactors included on the branch circuits to allow for a control means for area lighting beyond local control of an individual fixture/small group of fixtures, such as an office or conference room.
In general
1. The final branch circuits to be identified and rating load to be estimated.
2. Adequate utilization/diversity Factor to be applied if applicable (depends on the application).
3. To ensure the load balance over the 3 Phase as possible.
4. For Fluorescent light fixtures arrangement of the said fixtures with respect (RYB phases) is necessary to mitigate rendering/glaring and frequency affect.
5. Then size of cable from DB to LCP can be determined/sized, rating of the protective devices can be selected and type of CB(s) subject to type of lighting fixtures.
6. Verification of Voltage drop within the prescribed limit, otherwise select the next standard cable size.
A distribution board typically has poly-phase branch breakers with the intention of feeding either other sub-panels or large loads and lighting control panel (is also one type of distribution panel) will have mostly single-pole breakers with phase-to-neutral branch circuits feeding lighting circuitry.
Designing Gate drivers for IGBT
Q:
When designing gate drivers for IGBT’s, how reliable are the gate driver IC’s ? Now there are a lot of gate driver IC’s available in the market. For example i am using the Hybrid IC M57962L for driving IGBT’s for 3 phase inverter application. The peak output current of this Hybrid IC is 5A and it’s written in data sheet that it can be used for driving IGBT’s up to 200A, 1200V and many features in it.
For an initial design and for lower power rating the configuration is working fine. But, before going for higher power rating, i want to make sure about the reliability of Gate driver IC’s in general.
Is it advisable to design gate drivers using commercially available IC’s or go for a design which includes a gate drive transformer . What are the issues that may arise when using driver IC’s.
A:
I’ve seen and developed designs using these hybrid gate drives quite successfully with long term field reliability in applications requiring from 800 V to 1.25 kV voltage isolation in power conversion products for the semiconductor capital equipment market. Powerex offers various different isolated drivers like the M57962L – my personal favorite is the VLA-502 which also contains the isolated DC/DC converter used to power the isolated gate drive electronics.
There are only two problems that I remember in the last 10 years with these types of commercial drivers – and both problems, if I remember correctly were with the stand alone DC/DC converter intended to be used with the stand alone isolated driver. One problem was a voltage isolation issue from primary to secondary inside the DC/DC switcher. Powerex acknowledged the problem, and upgraded the design. I simply do not recall the part numbers involved. The second problem was with regard to how the isolated VEE rail was established – the monopolar output of the DC/DC converter was offset negative, and ground referenced with a zener diode – and when the IGBT gate would become active at high frequency (25 kHz for that particular application), the gate charge was high enough to sag the negative supply rail against the zener shunt.
Bottom line: Use a good isolated DC/DC converter, with solid VCC and VEE regulated outputs. The isolated drivers themselves are solid in my experience – a nice, simple solution with typically better rise and fall times than gate drive transformers. They also have the added benefit of being capable of holding positive or negative DC bias if the application requires it.
Difference between PLC and DDC system
PLC is defined as Programmable Logic Controller. It is a hardware, Includes processor, I/P & O/P Modules, Counters, Function Blocks, Timers,,, etc. The I/Os are either Analogue or Digitals or both. PLC can be configured to suit the application and to programmed in a logic manner by using one of the programing language such as Statement List, Ladder Diagram,, etc Interaction in real time between inputs and the resultant of the outputs through the program logic – PID – gives the entire Control System. While the Digital Control System I believe it is Software/ System that uses only Digital Signals for control and PLC/PC/Server/Central Unit may constitutes an Integral part of this system.
Harmonic current
I hate to call them harmonic currents. The do submit to Fourier analysis, but you are probably dealing with AC to DC power supplies. If you look at the current pulses, you will see that each pulse is about 1-2 milliseconds in duration in alternating directions. If you sum these all in the neutral there is the appearance of what looks like 180 Hertz in the neutral. If you use different sized power supplies on each phase, you can see that it is just the addition of the three phases. So the neutral current when you have non power factor corrected power supplies is the sum of the three phases. Unless the current waveforms overlap, there is no cancellation of current in the neutral, hence the neutral current is the sum of the phase currents. The reasoning behind this is the rectifier diodes in the front of the power supply and the DC storage capacitors size relative to the DC load on the capacitor. The general rule of thumb is that the capacitor is about 800 to 1000 microfarads per amp of current in the capacitor.
Realize that the extra heating in the three phase delta-wye transformers is due to the extra circulating current in the primary delta causing excessive heating of the primary conductor. The world calls transformers designed to deal with this “K” factor transformers. Let the world of electrical engineers bury all this simple stuff behind the maze of Fourier analysis. Change the incoming voltage slightly and your Fourier analysis is garbage. The issue here is switches and storage caps— not some magical mathematical garbage.
By the way if someone wanted to use the wire sizing guidelines of the National Electrical Code in the US to size wire for 100% power supply load, the neutral wire would be 8 gauge sizes larger than the phase conductors. People need to start demanding PFC power supplies. Fix a switching problem with switches.
Transmission line low voltages and overload situations
Q: I want to know just what the surge impedance loading (SIL) is but its relevance towards the improvement of stability and reliability of a power network especially an already existing one with various degrees of low voltages and overload situations?
A: The surge impedance loading will provide you with an easy way of determining if your transmission line is operated as a net reactor (above SIL, so external sources of
(2) line-voltage-drop limitation
(3) steady-state-stability limitation
In contrast with the line voltage drop limitation, the steady state stability limitation has been discussed quite extensively in the technical literature.
However, one important point is rarely made or given proper emphasis; that is, the stability limitation should take the complete system into account, not just the line alone. This has been a common oversight which, for the lower voltage lines generally considered in the past, has not led to significant misinterpretations concerning line loadability
At higher voltage classes such as 765 kV and above, the typical levels of equivalent system reactance at the sending and receiving end of a line become a significant factor which cannot be ignored in determining line loadability as limited by stability considerations, so surge impedance loading plays a fundamental role in reliability and stability.