Iacdrive|Automation Solution

VFD Kinetic Buffering and Flying restart

Voltage Loss ride through with flying restart:
In this method, when the voltage sag causes the variable frequency drive to reach its undervoltage trip level, the VFD drive will shut off the inverter section and thus remove power from the motor instead of tripping. The motor will coast down during the duration of the sag and, as soon as the voltage recovers, the VFD will start into the still-spinning motor and ramp up to set speed. How much the motor speed will drop depends on the inertia of the load and the duration of the sag.
You have to configure the VFD for flying restart. During low input voltage the inverter section is cut off to maintain the DC bus voltage. If the voltage restores before the DC bus voltage goes below the tripping value, the inverter is again put on but the driven load speed has already reduced due to brief period of no voltage at the motor terminal. Flying restart feature enables the variable frequency drive to restart the Motor at the same speed at which the motor is operating thus preventing any high current. So it is basically catching a spinning motor. Without flying restart high current will be observed once the inverter section is put ON. Flying restart feature is also helpful if you want to restart a motor which is already spinning.

Kinetic backup
This option, which is also provided by some variable frequency drive manufacturers, uses the energy stored in the mechanical load to keep the DC bus voltage from dropping down to the trip level. This is accomplished by running the inverter section during a voltage sag at a frequency slightly below the motor frequency, causing the motor to act as a generator. Similar to the flying restart option, the motor speed will drop while it is acting as a generator, however the advantage is that the motor is never disconnected from the drive. This option works best for those high-inertia loads.
Kinetic buffering is a feature to prevent the variable frequency drive from tripping during voltage sags. If the VFD trips due to DC bus undervoltage there is no need for kinetic buffering.

Hysteresis and eddy currents

Hysteresis would also lead to harmonics, complicating things even further. And, when considering unbalanced three-phase systems and/or the presence of harmonics, the conventional tools for power system analysis might not be applicable.

The losses due to hysteresis are limited by using better materials in transformer core. Eddy current losses are limited by using laminated construction. These losses are a relatively small portion of the total losses in a power system. Most of the losses are Joule losses (currents and resistances).

Because “energy” might be misinterpreted. Sure, But they do so twice (one positive, one negative) on every cycle of the AC system, so the average energy is zero.
There is an energy “exchange” between magnetic and electric fields. But no, that is not an oscillation in energy (kWh), not something that you could measure, for instance, in the torques on a mechanical shaft (that is purely kW, active power).

Charging Power transformer through lower rated grid auto Transformer

What is the Reactive Power?

For a “physical” interpretation, reactive current (power/KVA flow), in my opinion is best looked at from the perspective of a generator connected directly to an infinite bus (in LV generators this is the norm).

The generator when connected to the system, “see’s/feels” the parallel impedance combination of all other generators (circa 3 ohms each) with respect to ground – which basically parallel to equate to a zero impedance in terms of restriction to any current flow out of our generator.

Post initial synchronization, the system voltage prevents currents from flowing into or out of the generator due to pressure (voltage) balance of our generator matching that of the system voltage.

If you (as the generator operator), try to lift the generator voltage, the result will only be heaps of current output flowing into the system – but with no actual extra power generated!

This is due to the fact that to achieve the extra generator voltage setpoint you desired, the generator must send out enough current into the system impedance to create the back emf required to achieve the new desired generator terminal voltage setpoint.

But because the system impedance to ground is very low (as it actually is) – then despite the extra current sent out in that fruitless attempt, the generator is near impotent to make any substantial effect on raising the “system” voltage – “fruitless” current sent out.

In a DC sense you can equate this to a small DC generator trying to lift the voltage of a load system that has a zener diode installed across that system load.

Back to the AC world, ….that current sent out in the fruitless attempt to lift system voltage must flow through the parallel low impedance of the other connected generators (each of those working against you – lowering their own generator excitation, hell bent on keeping their own same old voltage set points), thwarting our futile attempt to achieve a raise in the system voltage.

All those generators, although collectively of low impedance, compose virtually no resistance, compared to their inductive reactance. Hence all our little generators current flow – in its futile attempt to lift system volts – is virtually purely inductive.

So we have heaps of current flowing out in our attempt to lift generator volts, but because the current is 90 degrees lagging the voltage, the only power imposed on the generator prime mover is that due to the resistance of the generator windings (circa 1% of the full load current rating – hence basically un-noticeable).

Hence the physical interpretation of VAR’s, is actually simply a look at the voltage balance perspective of an electricity network. It’s the collective attempt of many parallel-connected generators to influence the system voltage – either trying to raise the voltage at a particular node (positive VAR’s) or trying to reduce the voltage at a particular node (negative VAR’s flowing back through our generator due to our attempt to lower our generator setpoint – which “lets current in”).

Reactive Power is an electrical parameter that exist in a sinusoidal (AC circuits). It maybe zero or a certain magnitude. It maybe capacitive in nature or it maybe inductive nature. In the power triangle, it is the vertical power component (plus or minus / capacitive or reactive). It may be supplied from power sending end (grid or generator) on from the power receiving end (load). A capacitor bank connected on the grid provides capacitive reactive power. An inductor bank connected on the grid provides inductive reactive power. Both of them have magnitude. Reactive power also influences the between phase angle displacement between the voltage and the current. It is power but reactive power.

Add filters to frequency inverter to eliminate harmful

The high frequency edges of switched waveforms can cause capacitively coupled currents to flow from windings to frame, returning through the bearings, and these can accelerate corrosion in the bearings, causing early failure. Small filters on the motor leads allowing these currents to return locally to ground will avoid this.

The best way, though, is to use filters which can eliminate sharp transitions and leave only (like +/-10% ripple) fundamental frequency (motor’s RPM at given point) of the motor drives. However if somebody can handle 40 – 50kHz of the switching frequency the filter’s size shrinks dramatically and it is not too expensive anymore. Again, the problem is in ability to handle 100 (or so) kWs and 50kHz together.

Why BLDC motors are noiseless compare to Induction motor?

If referring to the acoustic noise generated at or around the PWM frequency of the PWM frequency. There are more laminations in an induction machine. This may account for some of the difference.

I also don’t know what the relative power difference is between the BLDC and the induction machine. If it’s about a 5Hp BLDC and a 100Hp induction machine, then you can bet that the PWM frequency of the BLDC is likely above the audible range and the PWM frequency of the induction inverter is well within the audible range.

These are just a few reasons that you may find subtle differences between the two. There are many factors and more information is needed to really help understand your specific situation.
I also believe there are simply sophomoric and unprofessional answers. My statement is based on the general rule that there is greater surface area between laminations of squirrel cage induction machine then there are in BLDC machines. Of course, if you want to state that you have a thin lamination on a long stack length design for a BLDC then there may be an argument that such a motor design when compared to a typical induction machine of the same power has a similar surface-to-surface lamination area. It is these laminations moving due to eddy currents at the PWM frequency that causes the audible noise.

BLDC can come with very small inductance which requires a higher PWM frequency, if you compare both them with controller that may cause different.
If you build 2 motor using exact mechanical shapes and electrical parameter they should be very close. You can build 2 induction machines from 2 different vendors to same electrical spec and they will not sound the same.

Are variable speed drives harmful to motor?

Variable speed drive switches very fast which brings high dv/dt on motor. How often do we face with problems coming with VSD? How harmful is the common mode currents in windings and other parts of motor due to high dv/dt. Do we see winding isolation failure? How much does the life of motor reduce? Also, is the filtering of voltage at the output of inverter common or applicable practice in the field?

The waveforms for the INVERTER are not good to the motor…. Makes the motor run hot and less efficient….. and all the above….
In-line filters to reduce harmonics is a must in many cases…
Depending on power levels you can have in line reactors for CM and DM or balanced bridge methods for CM… There is methods of harmonic canceling with reactors called harmonic blockers, where you arrange the 3 phase windings in such a manner to cancel certain harmonics….not all harmonics will be blocked, usually in grouping intervals…you need to be aware of what harmonics are your worst offenders…

Mostly in medium and high voltage motor drives the very fast change of the voltage can induce high capacitive currents inside the motor with harmful results.
A way to reduce this negative effect is to increase the number of voltage steps (levels) such that the dV/dT will decrease proportionally (dT=turn on switching time, dV=one voltage step). The most popular method used is SVPWM (space vector sine PWM) NPC (neutral point clamped) multilevel frequency converter. Line L-C filters are also used for EMC.

The first step in any filter analysis is knowing what harmonic vectors your dealing with.
Mathcad is a great tool for modeling the PWM modulation with the sub carrier and generating the harmonic matrices..vectors…I usually go above the 100th harmonic in some analysis, then doing this over the operating ranges of the motor….you then pick your Worse Case operating point and now you have a matrices to work with…. Summing the harmonic magnitudes will give you an idea of how much garbage your feeding your motor windings.

They could be harmful for high frequency current and voltages which are not economical to be eliminated.
But this weakness is so neglect able to the benefits providing. These benefits are very comprehensive. The harmful harmonics are controlled by the standards, so in order to improve harmonic characteristics, we need an improved standard.

Lighting control panel to distribution board

There are a couple of construction differences which may be present, depending on the style of “lighting control panel”.

First, a distribution board typically has poly-phase branch breakers with the intention of feeding either other sub-panels or large loads — such as a motor with a motor controller.

A lighting control panel will have mostly single-pole breakers with phase-to-neutral branch circuits feeding lighting circuitry. There is the added possibility of having either ‘smart’ breakers or integral contactors included on the branch circuits to allow for a control means for area lighting beyond local control of an individual fixture/small group of fixtures, such as an office or conference room.

In general
1. The final branch circuits to be identified and rating load to be estimated.
2. Adequate utilization/diversity Factor to be applied if applicable (depends on the application).
3. To ensure the load balance over the 3 Phase as possible.
4. For Fluorescent light fixtures arrangement of the said fixtures with respect (RYB phases) is necessary to mitigate rendering/glaring and frequency affect.
5. Then size of cable from DB to LCP can be determined/sized, rating of the protective devices can be selected and type of CB(s) subject to type of lighting fixtures.
6. Verification of Voltage drop within the prescribed limit, otherwise select the next standard cable size.

A distribution board typically has poly-phase branch breakers with the intention of feeding either other sub-panels or large loads and lighting control panel (is also one type of distribution panel) will have mostly single-pole breakers with phase-to-neutral branch circuits feeding lighting circuitry.

Designing Gate drivers for IGBT

Q:
When designing gate drivers for IGBT’s, how reliable are the gate driver IC’s ? Now there are a lot of gate driver IC’s available in the market. For example i am using the Hybrid IC M57962L for driving IGBT’s for 3 phase inverter application. The peak output current of this Hybrid IC is 5A and it’s written in data sheet that it can be used for driving IGBT’s up to 200A, 1200V and many features in it.

For an initial design and for lower power rating the configuration is working fine. But, before going for higher power rating, i want to make sure about the reliability of Gate driver IC’s in general.
Is it advisable to design gate drivers using commercially available IC’s or go for a design which includes a gate drive transformer . What are the issues that may arise when using driver IC’s.

A:
I’ve seen and developed designs using these hybrid gate drives quite successfully with long term field reliability in applications requiring from 800 V to 1.25 kV voltage isolation in power conversion products for the semiconductor capital equipment market. Powerex offers various different isolated drivers like the M57962L – my personal favorite is the VLA-502 which also contains the isolated DC/DC converter used to power the isolated gate drive electronics.

There are only two problems that I remember in the last 10 years with these types of commercial drivers – and both problems, if I remember correctly were with the stand alone DC/DC converter intended to be used with the stand alone isolated driver. One problem was a voltage isolation issue from primary to secondary inside the DC/DC switcher. Powerex acknowledged the problem, and upgraded the design. I simply do not recall the part numbers involved. The second problem was with regard to how the isolated VEE rail was established – the monopolar output of the DC/DC converter was offset negative, and ground referenced with a zener diode – and when the IGBT gate would become active at high frequency (25 kHz for that particular application), the gate charge was high enough to sag the negative supply rail against the zener shunt.

Bottom line: Use a good isolated DC/DC converter, with solid VCC and VEE regulated outputs. The isolated drivers themselves are solid in my experience – a nice, simple solution with typically better rise and fall times than gate drive transformers. They also have the added benefit of being capable of holding positive or negative DC bias if the application requires it.

Difference between PLC and DDC system

PLC is defined as Programmable Logic Controller. It is a hardware, Includes processor, I/P & O/P Modules, Counters, Function Blocks, Timers,,, etc. The I/Os are either Analogue or Digitals or both. PLC can be configured to suit the application and to programmed in a logic manner by using one of the programing language such as Statement List, Ladder Diagram,, etc Interaction in real time between inputs and the resultant of the outputs through the program logic – PID – gives the entire Control System. While the Digital Control System I believe it is Software/ System that uses only Digital Signals for control and PLC/PC/Server/Central Unit may constitutes an Integral part of this system.