Iacdrive|Automation Solution

Variable frequency drive key functions

Soft Starter, Auto Transformer, Electrolyte, series resistance – wound rotor- etc,). The starting factor of VFD drive is usually 1 up to 1.2 with respect to the rated load current while for Direct On line about 5-6.

Moreover and as you know the variable frequency drive can control the speed of the AC motors in accordance to the formula N=120f/P rpm
where f = the supply frequency and P = number of the Poles.
According to this formula, Motor Speed can be changed either by changing/control the frequency or by changing the number of Poles of the Motor by which step changed in the RPM will be given, while the former gives continuous variable speed as per application demand.

However, as per newly developed power Semi Conductor IGCT based on PWM VFD became the most smart, effective and efficient control device in Industries since is associated also with protective and monitoring means.

From my experience, I know that variable frequency drive plays around with the frequency which the motor operates. It starts at low speed and varies the frequency to attain maximum speed. This reduces the high starting torque usually experienced when motors are started on DOL, Star/Delta etc. When you are driving delicate materials through your conveyors or pumping liquid through pipes etc., VFD plays a useful role. It reduces hammering in pipes usually experienced when using DOL. In large hotel application, variable frequency drive could be used with pressure switches to regulate water flow and reduce hammering when guests are showing. The volume of water required will determine the speed at which the motor runs through VFD control. However, very large KW motors at high voltage level are usually started DOL due to the cost of ac drive but that is when one has enough (power) capacity otherwise it will impact on other users in the network.

Transformer tap changer

Q:
We are frequently changing tap position of Unit station transformer due to voltage problem. What are the impacts on transformer life and is there any solution to minimize this?

A:
Having more tap changing per week is not bad, but it wears out the tap changer faster and does require more maintenance. We set our bandwidth at 1.5 volts, 0.75 up and 0.75 down, with a minimum timer of 30 seconds (voltage has to be out of bandwidth for more than 30 seconds for tap changer to move). Voltage for the OLTC controller is based on a 120V base. This normally worked well for our city loads, but perhaps your loads vary even more. I have used a bandwidth of 2 volts maximum with good success to keep the OLTC from tapping more than I liked (250 taps per week, and naturally if your loads swing more than what we had then your taps per week are going to be higher). The 250 count per week maximum is just a goal we set to try and maximize the life of our tap changers and minimize our maintenance. Looking at your timer and bandwidth may help reduce the taps per week. When the tap count per week jumps up suddenly you can suspect the controller might be bad. One more thing, I never use the X setting, just the R. I would draw the voltage “curve” versus the current and figure out my maximum voltage based on the maximum current. This worked well for me for my 23 years of utility work (again, these are city loads, base power factor during the summer was 85%). The power factor would be higher in the winter and lower in the summer (summer at 85% and winter was over 95% because in the winter we had no air conditioning loads). That is why I did not use the X setting (one setting year round).

Since it appears that you are talking about OLTC, then 250 taps per week is the maximum level that is reasonable in my opinion for a transformer serving varying loads, such as a city. I worked for electric utilities in the US for 23 years and looked at load tap changing counts every week for over 450 MW of transformers (15 MVA to 46 MVA all serving city loads). This count is the top end we would allow. The average count was in the 125-150 range per week (summer loads, with wide varying loads each day, winter loads caused less tapping per week). Oil does not degrade rapidly in the OLTC (that is operating properly) even with a maximum of 250 counts per week, but we would take oil samples every year of the OLTC and the transformer to keep tabs on their overall health. If the oil in the OLTC does degrade rapidly, then there is a good chance that the alignment of the taps is improper and arcing may be occurring during the tap changing.

OLTC has little or no effect on the life of the transformer. Also, there are two separate oil compartments, one for the OLTC and one for the transformer.

VFD Kinetic Buffering and Flying restart

Voltage Loss ride through with flying restart:
In this method, when the voltage sag causes the variable frequency drive to reach its undervoltage trip level, the VFD drive will shut off the inverter section and thus remove power from the motor instead of tripping. The motor will coast down during the duration of the sag and, as soon as the voltage recovers, the VFD will start into the still-spinning motor and ramp up to set speed. How much the motor speed will drop depends on the inertia of the load and the duration of the sag.
You have to configure the VFD for flying restart. During low input voltage the inverter section is cut off to maintain the DC bus voltage. If the voltage restores before the DC bus voltage goes below the tripping value, the inverter is again put on but the driven load speed has already reduced due to brief period of no voltage at the motor terminal. Flying restart feature enables the variable frequency drive to restart the Motor at the same speed at which the motor is operating thus preventing any high current. So it is basically catching a spinning motor. Without flying restart high current will be observed once the inverter section is put ON. Flying restart feature is also helpful if you want to restart a motor which is already spinning.

Kinetic backup
This option, which is also provided by some variable frequency drive manufacturers, uses the energy stored in the mechanical load to keep the DC bus voltage from dropping down to the trip level. This is accomplished by running the inverter section during a voltage sag at a frequency slightly below the motor frequency, causing the motor to act as a generator. Similar to the flying restart option, the motor speed will drop while it is acting as a generator, however the advantage is that the motor is never disconnected from the drive. This option works best for those high-inertia loads.
Kinetic buffering is a feature to prevent the variable frequency drive from tripping during voltage sags. If the VFD trips due to DC bus undervoltage there is no need for kinetic buffering.

Hysteresis and eddy currents

Hysteresis would also lead to harmonics, complicating things even further. And, when considering unbalanced three-phase systems and/or the presence of harmonics, the conventional tools for power system analysis might not be applicable.

The losses due to hysteresis are limited by using better materials in transformer core. Eddy current losses are limited by using laminated construction. These losses are a relatively small portion of the total losses in a power system. Most of the losses are Joule losses (currents and resistances).

Because “energy” might be misinterpreted. Sure, But they do so twice (one positive, one negative) on every cycle of the AC system, so the average energy is zero.
There is an energy “exchange” between magnetic and electric fields. But no, that is not an oscillation in energy (kWh), not something that you could measure, for instance, in the torques on a mechanical shaft (that is purely kW, active power).

Motor connection

Many years ago I had an experience of 4nos 37kW fin-fan motors wrongly connected at site to a star. After running for almost 1 year, the operators reported these motors were very warm and felt unusual. We removed one of them to the workshop and opened for inspection. All windings were OK but the rotor lamination surface had turned to light blue colour which showed a sign of abnormal heating.

I asked different experts in the industries for advices. From the advices, we suspected the motor could be designed for a delta connection even though the nameplate indicated a Star connection for 415V. We contacted the motor manufacturer by quoting the motor serial no. The manufacturer confirmed that the motors were designed for delta connection at 415V. The manufacturer apologized for the error in nameplate and gave us a free spare motor.

One clear sign that could lead us to believe that the motor was in a wrong star connection instead of delta was, for a 2 or 4-pole motor the no load running current should be more or less around 30% of FLC. When we tested run the motor in the workshop, the no load current was less than 15%xFLC.

After the rectification of all the 4 motors to delta connection, we had no complaint anymore. It was a good lesson out of this solved problem.

Torque ripple information from low resolution speed signal

Q:
I am trying to develop a controller for switched reluctance motor which minimizes torque ripple. My design is acquiring torque ripple information from speed signal. In simulation a high pass filter for speed gives me good ripple information. But in experiments I am using a 500 PPR optical absolute encoder to get the position and then calculate the speed using microcontroller (dspace) capture module. But the filtered speed signal does not provide much ripple information. Can you suggest any method to extract ripple information from low resolution speed signal.

A:
1. In simulation, do you consider motor inertia? Inertia filters out torque ripple’s impact on speed, resulting in a smooth speed signal. 2. Generally speaking, a low resolution position sensor produces speed signal of more noise, especially at low speed. I would expect more noise out of your high pass filter.

An encoder generally does not specify an accuracy for the A to A! channel or B to B! channel or it is so broad a spec that it is useless. If you have the ability to trigger a clock on A and B to determine the period between A and B channels the difference between successive reads will give you a good indication of your ripple.

In some cases of motor – encoder installations the mechanical alignment of the encoder to the exact center of motor shaft can cause misalignment noise to occur in the resolved speed signal. In theory the ripple signal could provide useful information however in practice there are too many other influences. Even the shaftless encoder mounting has some of these difficulties.

Add filters to frequency inverter to eliminate harmful

The high frequency edges of switched waveforms can cause capacitively coupled currents to flow from windings to frame, returning through the bearings, and these can accelerate corrosion in the bearings, causing early failure. Small filters on the motor leads allowing these currents to return locally to ground will avoid this.

The best way, though, is to use filters which can eliminate sharp transitions and leave only (like +/-10% ripple) fundamental frequency (motor’s RPM at given point) of the motor drives. However if somebody can handle 40 – 50kHz of the switching frequency the filter’s size shrinks dramatically and it is not too expensive anymore. Again, the problem is in ability to handle 100 (or so) kWs and 50kHz together.

Why BLDC motors are noiseless compare to Induction motor?

If referring to the acoustic noise generated at or around the PWM frequency of the PWM frequency. There are more laminations in an induction machine. This may account for some of the difference.

I also don’t know what the relative power difference is between the BLDC and the induction machine. If it’s about a 5Hp BLDC and a 100Hp induction machine, then you can bet that the PWM frequency of the BLDC is likely above the audible range and the PWM frequency of the induction inverter is well within the audible range.

These are just a few reasons that you may find subtle differences between the two. There are many factors and more information is needed to really help understand your specific situation.
I also believe there are simply sophomoric and unprofessional answers. My statement is based on the general rule that there is greater surface area between laminations of squirrel cage induction machine then there are in BLDC machines. Of course, if you want to state that you have a thin lamination on a long stack length design for a BLDC then there may be an argument that such a motor design when compared to a typical induction machine of the same power has a similar surface-to-surface lamination area. It is these laminations moving due to eddy currents at the PWM frequency that causes the audible noise.

BLDC can come with very small inductance which requires a higher PWM frequency, if you compare both them with controller that may cause different.
If you build 2 motor using exact mechanical shapes and electrical parameter they should be very close. You can build 2 induction machines from 2 different vendors to same electrical spec and they will not sound the same.

Are variable speed drives harmful to motor?

Variable speed drive switches very fast which brings high dv/dt on motor. How often do we face with problems coming with VSD? How harmful is the common mode currents in windings and other parts of motor due to high dv/dt. Do we see winding isolation failure? How much does the life of motor reduce? Also, is the filtering of voltage at the output of inverter common or applicable practice in the field?

The waveforms for the INVERTER are not good to the motor…. Makes the motor run hot and less efficient….. and all the above….
In-line filters to reduce harmonics is a must in many cases…
Depending on power levels you can have in line reactors for CM and DM or balanced bridge methods for CM… There is methods of harmonic canceling with reactors called harmonic blockers, where you arrange the 3 phase windings in such a manner to cancel certain harmonics….not all harmonics will be blocked, usually in grouping intervals…you need to be aware of what harmonics are your worst offenders…

Mostly in medium and high voltage motor drives the very fast change of the voltage can induce high capacitive currents inside the motor with harmful results.
A way to reduce this negative effect is to increase the number of voltage steps (levels) such that the dV/dT will decrease proportionally (dT=turn on switching time, dV=one voltage step). The most popular method used is SVPWM (space vector sine PWM) NPC (neutral point clamped) multilevel frequency converter. Line L-C filters are also used for EMC.

The first step in any filter analysis is knowing what harmonic vectors your dealing with.
Mathcad is a great tool for modeling the PWM modulation with the sub carrier and generating the harmonic matrices..vectors…I usually go above the 100th harmonic in some analysis, then doing this over the operating ranges of the motor….you then pick your Worse Case operating point and now you have a matrices to work with…. Summing the harmonic magnitudes will give you an idea of how much garbage your feeding your motor windings.

They could be harmful for high frequency current and voltages which are not economical to be eliminated.
But this weakness is so neglect able to the benefits providing. These benefits are very comprehensive. The harmful harmonics are controlled by the standards, so in order to improve harmonic characteristics, we need an improved standard.

Lighting control panel to distribution board

There are a couple of construction differences which may be present, depending on the style of “lighting control panel”.

First, a distribution board typically has poly-phase branch breakers with the intention of feeding either other sub-panels or large loads — such as a motor with a motor controller.

A lighting control panel will have mostly single-pole breakers with phase-to-neutral branch circuits feeding lighting circuitry. There is the added possibility of having either ‘smart’ breakers or integral contactors included on the branch circuits to allow for a control means for area lighting beyond local control of an individual fixture/small group of fixtures, such as an office or conference room.

In general
1. The final branch circuits to be identified and rating load to be estimated.
2. Adequate utilization/diversity Factor to be applied if applicable (depends on the application).
3. To ensure the load balance over the 3 Phase as possible.
4. For Fluorescent light fixtures arrangement of the said fixtures with respect (RYB phases) is necessary to mitigate rendering/glaring and frequency affect.
5. Then size of cable from DB to LCP can be determined/sized, rating of the protective devices can be selected and type of CB(s) subject to type of lighting fixtures.
6. Verification of Voltage drop within the prescribed limit, otherwise select the next standard cable size.

A distribution board typically has poly-phase branch breakers with the intention of feeding either other sub-panels or large loads and lighting control panel (is also one type of distribution panel) will have mostly single-pole breakers with phase-to-neutral branch circuits feeding lighting circuitry.