Iacdrive|Automation Solution

Resistance Grounding System

Low Resistance Grounding:
1. Limits phase-to-ground currents to 200-400A.
2. Reduces arcing current and, to some extent, limits arc-flash hazards
associated with phase-to-ground arcing current conditions only.
3. May limit the mechanical damage and thermal damage to shorted
transformer and rotating machinery windings.
4. Does not prevent operation of overcurrent devices.
5. Does not require a ground fault detection system.
6. May be utilized on medium or high voltage systems. GE offers low
resistance grounding systems up to 72kV line-to-line.
7. Conductor insulation and surge arrestors must be rated based on the lineto-
line voltage. Phase-to-neutral loads must be served through an
isolation transformer.

High Resistance Grounding:
1. Limits phase-to-ground currents to 5-10A.
2. Reduces arcing current and essentially eliminates arc-flash hazards
associated with phase-to-ground arcing current conditions only.
3. Will eliminate the mechanical damage and may limit thermal damage to
shorted transformer and rotating machinery windings.
4. Prevents operation of overcurrent devices until the fault can be located
(when only one phase faults to ground).
5. Requires a ground fault detection system to notify the facility engineer that
a ground fault condition has occurred.
6. May be utilized on low voltage systems or medium voltage systems up to
5kV. IEEE Standard 141-1993 states that “high resistance grounding
should be restricted to 5kV class or lower systems with charging currents
of about 5.5A or less and should not be attempted on 15kV systems, unless
proper grounding relaying is employed”.
7. Conductor insulation and surge arrestors must be rated based on the lineto-
line voltage. Phase-to-neutral loads must be served through an
isolation transformer.

Conclusion:
Resistance Grounding Systems have many advantages over solidly grounded systems including arc-flash hazard reduction, limiting mechanical and thermal damage associated with faults, and controlling transient overvoltages. High resistance grounding systems may also be employed to maintain service continuity and assist with locating the source of a fault.
When designing a system with resistors, the design/consulting engineer must consider the specific requirements for conductor insulation ratings, surge arrestor ratings, breaker single-pole duty ratings, and method of serving phase-to-neutral loads.

What causes cables to fault during weather seasonal changes?

I currently work for a small utility with a small amount of underground installations but a lot of it is aging and failing during weather changes. I am curious as to why it happens during weather changes and if there are scientific facts that can support it? Is there a way to predict when a cable will fail based on weather patterns? I’ve heard of different opinions on the matter, but is there a proven reason why? It is my goal as a young engineer and Gonzaga T&D engineering graduate student to learn more about these phenomena’s and what better way than to hear it from industry professionals in a technical discussion?

Scenario #1: Lightning strikes during summer on power cable installations can cause voltage spikes on the line, which in turn doubles back when it finds the open point on an underground cable installation. The initial voltage spike can cause the insulation of the cable to deteriorate or fail, and the reflection of the surge can cause the voltage to spike which can then finish off the already deteriorating insulation if it hadn’t faulted from the initial surge. Side note: This is why it is good practice to have transformers with load on them at the end of a cable run, or lightning arrestor at the termination points of an underground run and not just an open switch. Faults, recloser operations and other switching events can also cause a voltage spike on underground installations which can break down the cable insulation, thus making it more susceptible to failing after future events.

Scenario #2: Cables could fail more during the weather change due to the stresses that are inserted in to the cables during heavy irrigation motor start-ups and operation. Today you will see more soft-starts on your pump motors. With older cable supplying energy to older pumps you may find an across the line motor starter at the end of it. Cross-line starters rapidly heat the cables that have laid dormant over the cold winter months. If there was any sort of treeing, insulation deterioration, rodents chewing on the dormant cable, dig-ins, or any other common cable damaging scenarios during the winter, the startup will speed the deterioration process up in these locations, which in turn lead to cable faults.

Scenario #3: In areas where older open concentric cable has been installed, you are most likely experiencing many faults if it hasn’t already been changed out for newer jacketed solid-dielectric cable. As the ground dries out in the spring/summer, you will see higher resistances on the return path of the old and deteriorating open concentric neutrals. Without the cable being in wet conditions as it was throughout the winter, the electric field around the cable is no longer uniform and in some cases is a complete loss of your neutral.

Regardless of the insulation you use on cables, you most likely have faults. Maybe you’ve been “lucky” and it’s only in your joints and terminations? Regardless of which type of cable insulation, temperature has a significant impact on the dielectric withstand of the cable (i.e. higher temperatures will result in lower dielectric strength properties). Drying conditions also equates to higher insulation temperature due to poor heat transfer characteristics of your cable.

There are some common points in each of the above three scenarios but there really isn’t any scientific proof, just observations. Does it depend on your system load factor, your power factor, your installation practices, or even your cable design? Is it all of the above or is it much more simple than that? Is it different between different manufacturers of cable? Are there different scenarios that you’ve seen or heard of?

480volt Solidly grounded system versus HRG system

High Resistance Ground will limit the current to about 5 amps. The good news is that it no longer be necessary to trip on a ground fault. The bad news is that you may not connect any single phase loads to that substation. If the single phase loads are an issue, it may be possible to support all those loads with one or two feeders. In that situation, an isolation transformer is added to create a separately derived ground.

High resistance grounding is an excellent option in systems where continuity of service is important. However it is important to understand that if a ground fault occurs, it needs to located and repaired. This can be at a time convenient to facility operation, but it must be chased down and fixed.

This troubleshooting is accomplished by pulsing the ground fault current between 5 and 8 amps. Then a hand held clamp on ammeter is used to search out the offending feeder. Most HRG manufacturers include this feature into their design.

480volt solid ground system the fault current L-g is limited to the fault rating of the system may be 50KA,and usually have a disastrous consequences during faults and system has to be properly selected and protected accordingly.

Presently for some emergency power systems in power plants there is a 480voltb 3ph supply is made with neutral grounded through a NGT ie to limit the L-g fault current within 10Amp, and this may result in overvoltage of the other two phases too. Overall this becomes a more stable system.

I would be very hesitant to use HRG for a medium voltage system. While a fault is on the system the neutral will not be at earth potential. This is usually not so important because the neutral is not carried to any of the loads on a high resistance grounded system. But the effect of the neutral straying away from ground potential is the two unfaulted phases will have a higher than normal line-to-ground voltage. Low voltage systems have a lot of built in margin in their insulation so it is not a problem with most equipment connected to that system. However MV equipment does not have so much “spare” insulation so the effect of high resistance grounding of a MV system is that it significantly increases the chance of migrating the fault from a single-line-to-ground fault to a double-line-to-ground or line-to-line fault.

Also at the point of the fault, the energy of 5 amps flowing in a 480 volt or 400 volt system may be somewhat dangerous but in most cases will be dissipated easily. On a higher voltage system, whether it is 4.16kV, 6.6kV, or higher, the energy at the point of the fault is higher and is much more likely to damage the insulation on the adjacent conductors and quickly turn into a more severe fault.

So I would resist using a high resistance grounded design on a medium voltage system (over 2000 volts).

The effect of power failure on VFD

Q: I am planning to put some variable frequency drives on non-critical section of factory where there will be planned interruption of 30 seconds but 2 times a day.

A: Why are you going to use VFD, variable frequency drives are expensive. What is the application?
If the application require fix speed / rate Soft Start device is required.

However, if there might be frequent start stop (Power OFF/ON) AC Contractor Duty AC3 are recommended to be used to bypass the Soft Starter or Static device once the required motor speed is reached and then Start/stop have no impact on the installation.

The technique of using AC3 Contactors, is not applicable for VFD if the VFD is necessary for application. In this case the other advantage associated with VFD no longer will be valid (Protection, control and monitoring).

AC induction motor constant power

An AC induction motor is supposed to be a constant power motor, which implies it draws more current on low voltage. Consider a motor running a constant torque load at a particular speed. Suppose now the voltage is reduced, which should cause it to settle down at a lower speed supplying the same torque as per the new torque speed characteristic. If we consider the electrical side, higher slip will cause more current to be drawn that too at higher pf, which should maintain the power justifying the above theory. But on the mechanical side the new output power Torque x speed is supposed to be lesser now as speed is less now. Is it this contradiction?

The following guidelines prove there is no contradiction since your question about Motor under running condition:

1. Torque / Slip characteristic for Induction Motor has three Zones.
a)- Starting Torque @ S=1, selection of this torque depends on the application. The starting should be greater the system torque at time of starting.
b)- Unstable Zone during which acceleration and torque development took place. This zone up to the Max. Torque can be developed.
In this regard, it may be necessary to mention that the seventh harmonics to be considered otherwise crawling / clogging may occur.
c)- Normal Operating Zone. NOZ about which your query raised. NOZ ranged as ” 0 < S< 1″ ie up to the Max. Torque. It is worth mentioning that Max. torque always remain the same regardless to its location of occurrence.

2. The torque is directly proportional to rotor resistance “r2” & varies with slip “S”. hence increase of rotor resistance is the most practical method of changing the torque (ie wound rotor Slip ring Motors). Moreover, the Max torque achieved when rotor Resistance “r2” = The Stator impedance, At starting S=1.

3. Accordingly, the ration r2/x2 gives the location of the max. Torque w.r.t Slip (if the max. torque is required at starting (S=!) then r2/x2 should equal “1”.

4. load being constant. Mechanical output = Electrical input – losses.

5. Tmax Propotional to Sq(v). decrease of 50% of the supply voltage generate a reduction of 20% in the max. running Torque (zone c) , increase in slip and also Full load current and temperature raise increase while the full load speed decrease. the status of the above parameters will be opposite if the voltage increases by 10%.

Based on the above, in all cases since the Motor is running within the operating range will be no issue unless the supply voltage falls behind the above limits (-50%, +110%). Accordingly, variable frequency drives provided by under/Over voltage protection relay to avoid damage to insulation due to Heat/temperature rise that will be generated due to excessive current intend to composite load.

System with difference neutral

Q:
I have one system with two source. One from genset and the other from PLN (national power supply company) that each system has neutral.
The question is
1. Is there any problem if I connect both neutral directly?
2. Is there any spark when I connect both neutral?
3. How is the best solution to connect both neutral?

A:
1. I understand that the Genset is dedicated for essential load as an Emergency power supply which will be operated by hand (only in Manual Mode).

2. The Control Philosophy for a Generator that intended to be connected to PLN as emergency power source depends on the local service provider regulations.

3. Usually in your case there should be Electrical as well as Mechanical interlocks between the mains incomer & genset main breaker. ie both Sources will never be in Synchronism ( will not feeding the same load simultaneously).This measures will ensure that there will be only neutral point to the system.

Simulation on EMI

As a mathematical tool eventually, simulation can help to quickly approach the results that we need. If everything is done in right way, simulation can give us reliable conductive EMI results at the low frequency range.

Differential mode conductive EMI can be simulated with good accuracy at the low frequency range. The accuracy of common mode conductive EMI depends on the accuracy of a few parasitic parameters that need to be measured.

Personally for research, I would like to use simulation as a validation tool for calculation, and test results of prototypes can be used as proof for simulation.

E.g. for EMI filter:

1. Do the calculation for the differential mode conductive EMI filter;
2. Do the calculation for common mode conductive EMI filter base upon the parasitic parameters in the hand or estimation;
3. Use the simulation to check and validate if the calculation is right or if something is wrong and needs to be corrected;
4. Use prototype test results to check and validate if the simulation results are right.

Some other issues that caused by EMI filter can be found during system level simulation before prototyping. E.g. audio susceptibility and EMI filter damping problems.

Soft start motor tripped in fuel oil suction and discharge

First of all check all the component i.e.CB, CT, Heat Element, and the O/L setting then megger the motor to be shore that there is no problem with the motor winding insulation.
After that let the mechanical check the vibration analyses during the start-up also measure the startup currant of the motor and diffidently you will find where is the problem.
It could be a relay setting; or problem in the insulation; or even a problem in the motor itself.

On the other hand, check the motor on No Load condition and tune it to the Soft starter before coupling it to the pump.
Auto Tuning feature is generally inbuilt to Advanced soft starters.
If the No load startup of the motor is perfect, 2 causes arise:
1) Improper design.
2) Viscosity _ this can be tackled if you can make some temporary arrangement for pre-heating to confirm if this is the culprit.

As using soft starter could result in reducing torque of the motor. Soft starter normally reduces starting current by reducing starting voltage. However, decreasing voltage will lead to starting toque reduction. Hence, the motor may take longer time, especially when driving high-inertia load, with somewhat high current until it reach its full speed. Using an inverter will help you get full starting torque or even boost up it to 150-200% while keeping starting current at 150-200% of full load. Installation of heat tracing might also help and economic.

Assuming it is an electrical problem. On a motor of this size it has separate overload protection from the ground fault and short circuit protection. There are tolerance levels for motor that you may not be within. However a megger will not answer all the possibilities with motors unless you are ready to perform polarization index test etc….A power analyzer will allow you to see the operation in real world application. Assuming you have confirmed this is an electrical problem your next step would be to use a power analyser. You should be able to confirm by the signature and different placements of the analyzer the problem. Analyzer should be around all three phases.

EMI & EMC

EMI/EMC is rather a subjective topic than theoretic, but we shall look at it with start from noise prevention then noise suppression.

Prevention or design in the solution is needed to concentrate on noise making part/component or its mechanism play in the circuit. These are referring to those part and circuit that directly involve in switching, like PFC mosfet and its driver, PFC diode, DC/DC switching mosfet and its driver, and its output diode, do not left out the magnetic part and layout design, bad design will cause ugly switching then give you headache in EMC problem.

Part/component and topology selection is somehow important in which had some level predetermine your EMI/EMS need to take care, like what Stephen had explained; phase-shift is better than none phase shift.

Mosfet would have higher noise at high frequency but it can be somehow compensated or tolerated or trick by driving speed, by using snubber and may be shielding. The output Diode should be carefully selected so that its high frequency noise is within your output noise spec else is an issue, please make sure this noise is not able to be transmitted out as Radiated noise, or it is not couple into your Primary circuit, else it will all the way out to the input AC then transmitted as Radiated noise. Trr is the parameter to look at, sure the lower the best. Anyhow, some snubber (RC or feerite bead,..) shall be determined and add-in.

Noise suppression is what refer to Filter, energy dumping circuit,.. but somehow is basic need, one of it Input filter that give noise isolation between what generated internal in psu not pass to input supply system that could interfere other system/supply environment (EMI), or what noise environment that could enter into your power supply and interfere your power supply (EMS). Input filter is definitely a must for your switching frequency and its sub-harmonics, which is fall into the EMI standard range.

There are many technique to suppress the noise and is depend on what location, nature of the circuit, switch and diode, like what you means by RCD, is not mistaken is refer to RCD that add across the main transformer, DC/DC switcher and typically at the output Diode, you are on right direction with using this snubber around these component.

Shielding may be needed for your main transformer if you have some gap in it (but is not needed if your controller and your switcher is so call good part), but may be needed after you have made some study it the samples.

Good layout always give peaceful mind, whereby noise part have to be some distant away from noise sensitive controller or decision making circuit, decision making connection point have to wise at right termination point that prevent sense the high noise content signal, but if no choice some RC filter is unpreventable, anyhow and mostly RC is commonly located even is known clean in noise to those decision making circuit.

Improve PF of pumping motor with soft starter controlled

I have 3 pumping motors of 1750 kw 6.6kv, with soft starter they are maintaining a pf of .96-.97. Now I want to install HT capacitors to use these motors in d.o.l, can I take the pf to .99 by using this?

If you are using soft starters now, do not take them out. These are really large motors and starting them across the line is not a good idea. The utility serving you should have designed their service based on you having soft starters for these motors. They probably also have a stipulation stating that you cannot start them all at the same time. Starting one or more them across the line may cause the utility’s transformer fuses to fail. Even if it doesn’t, the flicker may cause other processes in your facility to trip. Especially drives or undervoltage relays in MCC’s.

The only reason to install caps at this point would be to correct for power factor. Since your pf is .96 it will take years if not decades to get a return on your investment (ROI). My utility does not charge a pf penalty until you drop below .90. And even then, it is usually not worth installing a cap bank unless you are under .85 and correct to >.95. Most customers require a 3 to 5 year ROI and you will never get that. We always recommend designing for a .95 pf to leave some “headroom”. So, your existing design sounds like it is correct. Your company may also have a “kva rate” instead of a “kw rate” with the utility. Check with your utility marketing rep to verify what type rate you are own and to help you evaluate your ROI.

Also, when you install a capacitor bank you have to make sure that you do not hit a resonant harmonic frequency. You will have to get the utility involved to give you the short circuit data at the PCC (point of common coupling). If the calculated harmonic resonant point is near the 3,5,7,11 or 13 harmonic, you will need a harmonic filter installed in conjunction with the capacitor bank. That means more money and a longer ROI.