Category: Iacdrive_blog

Home  ›  Iacdrive_blog  ›  Page 25

How is frequency inverter saving energy?

This studies show that up to 80 percent of the energy from the power source to the industrial consumer can be lost. Energy conversion—converting energy into useful work via motors, heat exchangers, process heaters, pumps, motors, fans, compressors, and so forth—represents a large opportunity for energy savings in manufacturing. Industrial electric motor-driven systems represent the largest single category of electricity use in China.

The industrial sector consumes approximately one-third of the energy used in China (see Fig. 1).

Studies show that up to 80 percent of the energy from the power source to the industrial consumer is lost through the transition of raw material to the point of useful output—much of that at the point of conversion from electrical to mechanical output (see Fig. 2).

Rising energy costs, a sense of environmental responsibility, government regulation, and a need for energy reliability are driving efforts for energy efficiency in manufacturing.

Energy is lost primarily in three areas:

  • Generation
  • Distribution
  • Conversion

The third area, energy conversion—converting energy into useful work via motors, heat exchangers, process heaters, pumps, motors, fans, compressors, and so forth—represents a large opportunity for energy savings in manufacturing.

Industrial electric motor-driven systems represent the largest single category of electricity use in the China—more than 65 percent of power demand in industry. Consequently, motor-driven systems offer the highest energy savings potential in the industrial segment.

Supporting this statistic, studies show that 97 to 99 percent of motor life cycle costs are expended on the energy that the motor uses. This fact alone should be a driving motivation for companies to perform a periodic energy consumption analysis on the motor systems they use in their facilities.

Inefficient and ineffective control methods in two areas waste motor systems’ energy:

  • Mechanical flow control (pumps, fans, compressors)
  • Energy recovery (regeneration of braking energy or inertial energy)

An inverter is an effective tool in conserving and recovering energy in motor systems.

What Is a frequency inverter? Why Use It?

A frequency inverter controls AC motor speed (see Fig. 3). The frequency inverter converts the fixed supply frequency (60 Hz) to a variable-frequency, variable-voltage output to enable precise motor speed control. Many frequency inverters even have the potential to return energy to the power grid through their regenerative capability.

A frequency inverter’s precise process and power factor control and energy optimization result in several advantages:

  • Lower energy consumption saves money
  • Decreased mechanical stress reduces maintenance costs and downtime
  • Reduced mechanical wear and precise control produces more accurate products.
  • Lower consumption lowers carbon emissions and helps reduce negative impact on the environment.
  • Lower consumption qualifies for tax incentives, utility rebates, and, with some companies, energy savings finance programs, which short

Why we need Engineers?

Even the humble motor car runs diagnostics that the garage read to see the problems with your car. This doesn’t involve technicians looking at the code that controls the car but is 100% driven by the faults flagged by the car’s management system programs. These could even be displayed to the users, the drivers like me and you but the manufacturers don’t want amateurs hacking around their management systems and you know that is exactly what we would do.

Do we ask for this functionality from our car manufacturer? Do we complain about it and ask for them not to fit it? Would we like to go back to the “golden age” of motoring where we spent as much time under the hood as we did on the road?

You do?…. Yeah right and neither do I nor do I want a plant where I need a guy with a laptop to diagnose a blown fuse, sticking valve, overload trip, etc .

We need to change as Engineers by selling systems to customers that fulfill their needs, that are safe and reliable, that follow industry and international best practices and are user friendly. The notion of having to wait for a blank cheque from the customer to fulfill these goals is really a cop out, you either do what is right or just walk away because at the end of all this it is you who are under scrutiny when things go wrong not the customer who will plead ignorance.

Non-regenerative & Regenerative DC Drives

Non-regenerative DC drives, also known as single-quadrant drives, rotate in one direction only & they have no inherent braking capabilities. Stopping the motor is done by removing voltage & allowing the motor to coast to a stop. Typically nonregenerative drives operate high friction loads such as mixers, where the load exerts a strong natural brake. In applications where supplemental quick braking and/or motor reversing is required, dynamic braking & forward & reverse circuitry, may be provided by external means.

Dynamic braking (DB) requires the addition of a DB contactor & DB resistors that dissipate the braking energy as heat. The addition of an electromechanical (magnetic) reversing contactor or manual switch permits the reversing of the controller polarity & therefore the direction of rotation of the motor armature. Field contactor reverse kits can also be installed to provide bidirectional rotation by reversing the polarity of the shunt field.

All DC motors are DC generators as well. The term regenerative describes the ability of the drive under braking conditions to convert the generated energy of the motor into electrical energy, which is returned (or regenerated) to the AC power source. Regenerative DC drives operate in all four quadrants purely electronically, without the use of electromechanical switching contactors:

  • Quadrant I -Drive delivers forward torque, motor rotating forward (motoring mode of operation). This is the normal condition, providing power to a load similar to that of a motor starter.
  • Quadrant II -Drive delivers reverse torque, motor rotating forward (generating mode of operation). This is a regenerative condition, where the drive itself is absorbing power from a load, such as an overhauling load or deceleration.
  • Quadrant III -Drive delivers reverse torque, motor rotating reverse (motoring mode of opera tion). Basically the same as in quadrant I & similar to a reversing starter.
  • Quadrant IV -Drive delivers forward torque with motor rotating in reverse (generating mode of operation). This is the other regenerative condition, where again, the drive is absorbing power from the load in order to bring the motor towards zero speed.

A single-quadrant nonregenerative DC drive has one power bridge with six SCRs used to control the applied voltage level to the motor armature. The nonregenerative drive can run in only motoring mode, & would require physically switching armature or field leads to reverse the torque direction. A four-quadrant regenerative DC drive will have two complete sets of power bridges, with 12 con trolled SCRs connected in inverse parallel. One bridge controls forward torque, & the other controls reverse torque. During operation, only one set of bridges is active at a time. For straight motoring in the forward direction, the forward bridge would be in control of the power to the motor. For straight motoring in the reverse direction, the reverse bridge is in control.

Cranes & hoists use DC regenerative drives to hold back “overhauling loads” such as a raised weight, or a machine’s flywheel. Whenever the inertia of the motor load is greater than the motor rotor inertia, the load will be driving the motor & is called an over hauling load. Overhauling load results in generator action within the motor, which will cause the motor to send cur rent into the drive. Regenerative braking is summarized as follows:

  • During normal forward operation, the forward bridge acts as a rectifier, supplying power to the motor. During this period gate pulses are withheld from reverse bridge so that it’s inactive.
  • When motor speed is reduced, the control circuit withholds the pulses to the forward bridge & simultaneously applies pulses to reverse b

Systems Development Life-Cycle

Step 1. Initiation
Step 2. System Concept Development
Step 3. Planning
Step 4. Requirements Analysis
Step 5. Design
Step 6. Development
Step 7. Integration and Test
Step 8. Implementation
Step 9. Operation and Maintenance
Step 10.Disposition

There are three major players present in this model; Customer (client), System Integrator, and Machine or device manufacturer.

In many instances, the result of step 4 (Requirements Analysis), is an RFQ for the system implementation has been issued to one or more systems integrators. Upon selecting the system integrator, step 5 (Design) begins. Upon completing step 5 (Design), the system or process flow is defined. One of the major outputs from step 5 are the RFQs for the major functional components of the finished system. Based on the RFQ responses (bids), the Machine or device manufacturers are chosen.

Steps 6, 7, and 8 are where all the individual functional components are integrated. This is where the system integrator makes sure the outputs and feedback between to machines or devices is defined and implemented. Step 8 ends with a full systems functional test in a real manufacturing situation is demonstrated to the customer. This test includes demonstrating all error conditions defined by the requirements document and the systems requirements document. If a specific device or machine fails its respective function it is corrected (programming, wiring, or design) by the manufacturer and the test begins anew.

Each of the scenarios presented is correct. The technician role being presented (customer, integrator, or manufacturer) is not clear. System diagnostics are mandatory and need to be well defined, even in small simple machines. There should be very few and extreme conditions under which the customer’s technician should ever have to dig into a machine’s code to troubleshoot a problem. This condition usually indicates a design or integration oversight.

(You can find a complete description here, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_development_life-cycle)

DC drive typical applications

DC drive technology is the oldest form of electrical speed control. The speed of a DC motor is the simplest to control, & it can be varied over a very wide range. These drives are designed to handle applications such as:

Winders/coilers – In motor winder operations, maintaining tension is very important. DC motors are able to operate at rated current over a wide speed range, including low speeds.

Crane/hoist – DC drives offer several advantages in applications that operate at low speeds, such as cranes & hoists. Advantages include low-speed accuracy, short-time overload capacity, size, & torque providing control. A typical DC hoist motor & drive used on hoisting applications where an overhauling load is present.

Generated power from the DC motor is used for braking & excess power is fed back into the AC line. This power helps reduce energy requirements & eliminates the need for heat-producing dynamic braking resistors. Peak current of at least 250 percent is available for short-term loads.

Mining/drilling -The DC motor drive is often preferred in the high-horsepower applications required in the mining & drilling industry. For this type of application, DC drives offer advantages in size & cost. They are rugged, dependable, & industry proven.

Techniques contribute in control system

1. Any successful methodology is not a simple thing to come by and typically requires a huge commitment in time and money and resources to develop. It will take several generations to hone the methods and supporting tools.

2. Once you get the methods and tools in place, you then face a whole separate challenge of indoctrinating the engineers in the methods.

3. Unique HMI text involves a lot of design effort, implementation, and testing.

Many of the techniques contributed by others in the discussion address faults, but how do you address the “normal” things that can hold up an action such as waiting for a process condition to occur, such as waiting for a level/pressure/temperature to rise above/fall below a threshold or waiting for a part to reach a limit switch?

Some methods allow for a text message that describes each step. When developing these text messages, I focus on what the step’s transition is waiting for, not the actions that take place during the specific step. This helps both the operator to learn the process as well as diagnose what is preventing the machine from advancing to its next step.

I have seen sequencing engines that incorporate a “normal” step time that can be configured for each step and if the timer expires before the normal transition occurs, then you have “hold” condition. While effective, this involves a lot of up-front development time to understand the process and this does not come cheaply (with another nod to John’s big check!).

(Side note on sequential operations: I have used Sequential Function Charts (SFCs/GRAFCET) for over 20 years and find them to be exceptionally well-suited for step-wise operations, both from a development perspective as well as a troubleshooting perspective.)

I have seen these techniques pushed by end users (typically larger companies who have a vested interest in standardization across many sites) as well as OEMs and System Integrators who see these as business advantages in shortening development, startup, and support cycles. Again, these are long-term business investments that require a major commitment to achieve.

DC Drives QUIZ

1. List three types of operations where DC drives are commonly found.

2. How can the speed of a DC motor be varied?

3. What are the two main functions of the SCR semi conductors used in a DC drive power converter?

4. Explain how SCR phase angle control operates to vary the DC output from an SCR.

5. Armature-voltage-controlled DC drives are classified as constant-torque drives. What does this mean?

6. Why is three-phase AC power, rather than single phase, used to power most commercial & industrial DC drives?

7. List what input line & output load voltage information must be specified for a DC drive.

8. How can the speed of a DC motor be increased above that of its base speed?

9. Why must field loss protection be provided for all DC drives?

10. Compare the braking capabilities of nonregenerative & regenerative DC drives.

11. A regenerative DC drive requires two sets of power bridges. Why?

12. Explain what is meant by an overhauling load.

13. What are the advantages of regenerative braking versus dynamic braking?

14. How is the desired speed of a drive normally set?

15. List three methods used by DC drives to send feed back information from the motor back to the drive regulator.

16. What functions require monitoring of the motor armature current?

17. Under what operating condition would the mini mum speed adjustment parameter be utilized?

18. Under what operating condition would the maxi mum speed adjustment parameter be utilized?

19. IR compensation is a parameter found in most DC drives. What is its purpose?

20. What, in addition to the time it takes for the motor to go from zero to set speed, does acceleration time regulate?

Why companies don’t invest in variable frequency drive control

Investing in energy efficient variable frequency drives (VFD) seems like an obvious path to cutting a company’s operating costs, but it is one that many companies ignore. This article explores some possible reasons for this reluctance to invest in VFD.

There is a goldmine of savings waiting to be unlocked by controlling electric motors, but the reluctance to take advantage of this is a very puzzling phenomenon. Motors consume about two thirds of all electrical energy used by industry and cost 40 times more to run than to buy, so you would think optimizing their efficiency would be a priority. The reality is that this good idea is not always turned into good practice and many businesses are missing out on one of the best opportunities to boost profits and variable frequency drive growth.

It might surprise you to learn that your average 11kW motor may cost about £500 to buy but £120,000 to run at 8,000 hours per year over a 15-year lifetime (and that isn’t even accounting for inevitable increases in energy prices). It’s worth considering the payback on any investment in motor control that will reduce this significant running cost, such as using VFDs to control speed, or implementing automated starting and stopping when the motor is not needed. Payback times can often be less than 1 year and, of course, the savings continue over the lifetime of the system, particularly as energy costs rise.

The question that often arises when I talk about this subject to people is: “If the savings are so great, why don’t more people do this?” It would appear to be something that fits into the nobrainer category, however there are three main barriers to the wider uptake of motor control with variable frequency drive, none of which should stop common sense from prevailing – but all too often they do.

The first barrier is a lack of awareness of how much energy is being consumed, and where, in a business. A surprising number of companies do not have a nominated energy manager, still less have energy management as a dedicated job function or have a board member responsible for this significant cost. Those that do measure their energy consumption often have a financial rather than technical bias, so solutions tend towards renegotiating supply contracts, rather than reducing consumption.

The second barrier stems from the economic climate and the level of uncertainty about future events and policies. Businesses are still reluctant to invest in improvement projects, despite short payback periods and the ongoing benefits. The short-term focus is on cutting costs, not on spending money, even to the detriment of future growth. This make-do-and-mend attitude is often proudly touted as a strength, but it is ultimately a false economy. Saving money by cutting capital budgets, reducing staff and cancelling training is damaging to a business and to morale, making it difficult to grow again when the opportunity arises. Saving money by reducing energy consumption makes a business more competitive, while keeping hold of key skills and resources.

The third barrier is a focus on purchase cost, rather than lifetime cost. Whenever a business invests in a machine, a production line or a ventilation system, you can be sure they will have a rigorous process for getting several quotes, usually comparing price, with the lowest bid winning. Something that is not often evaluated is the lifetime energy cost of the system. Competing suppliers will seek to reduce the capital cost of the equipment but without considering the true cost for the operator, including energy consumption. What if the cost of automation and motor control added £700 to the purchase cost? Many suppliers will consider cutting this from the specification. But what if that control saved £1,400 per year in energy? It co

Variable frequency drive saves energy on fans

Like pumps, fans consume significant electrical energy while serving several applications. In many plants, the VFDs (variable frequency drives) of fans together account for 50% to 60% of the total electricity used. Centrifugal fans are the most common but some applications also use axial fans and positive-displacement blowers. The following steps help identify optimization opportunities in systems that consume substantial energy running the fan with VFDs.

Step 1: Install variable frequency drive on partially loaded fans, where applicable. Any fan that is throttled at the inlet or outlet may offer an opportunity to save energy. Most combustion-air-supply fans for boilers and furnaces are operated at partial loads compared to their design capacities. Some boilers and furnaces also rely on an induced-draft fan near their stack; it must be dampened to maintain the balanced draft during normal operation. Installing VFDs on these fans is worthy of consideration.

Similar to centrifugal pump operation, the affinity law applies here. Because constant-speed motors consume the same amount of energy regardless of damper position, using dampers to maintain the pressure or flow is an inefficient way to control fan operation.

Step 2: Switch to inlet vane dampers. These dampers are slightly more efficient than discharge dampers. When a VFD can’t be installed to control fan operation, shifting to inlet vane control could provide marginal energy savings.

Step 3: Replace the motor on heavily throttled fans with a lower speed one, if applicable. Smaller capacity fans with high-speed motor VFDs operate between 25% and 50% of their design capacity. Installing a low-speed motor VFD could save considerable energy.

For example, a 2,900-rpm motor drove a plant’s primary combustion air fan with the discharge side damper throttled to about 75–80%. Installing a VFD on this motor would save considerable energy, but we recommended switching to a standard 1,450-rpm motor. This was implemented immediately, as 1,450-rpm motors are readily available. With the lower-speed motor, the damper can be left at near 90% open; the fan’s power consumption dropped to less than 50% of the previous level.

Step 4: Control the speed when multiple fans operate together. Fans consume a significant amount of energy in industrial cooling and ventilation systems. Supply fans of HVAC systems are good candidates for speed control by variable frequency drives, if not already present.

Step 5: Switch off ventilation fans when requirements drop. Ventilation systems usually run a single large centrifugal fan or several axial exhaust fans. A close look at their operation may indicate these fans could be optimized depending upon the actual ventilation needs of the building they serve.

Recently, we surveyed a medium-sized industrial facility where 26 axial-type exhaust fans were installed on the roof of one building. All fans were operating continuously, even though the building had many side wall openings and not much heat generated inside. To better conserve energy, we suggested the 26 fans be divided into four groups with variable frequency drives controlled for each group. As a result, energy consumption for the fans dropped by about 50%, as only the required fan groups now are switched on.

At another industrial site, the exhaust fan of a paint booth ran continuously but paint spraying was scheduled only about 50% of the time. Modifying fan operation with variable frequency drive and delayed sequencing saved energy.

Pumps and fans are the most common energy-consuming devices

Variable Air Volume System Optimization

Variable Air Volume Systems (VAV) can be optimized to increase energy savings by maximizing the efficiency of the equipment at part-load conditions. The goal with the optimization strategy is to run each subsystem (chiller, cooling tower, Airhandler, etc) in the most efficient way possible while maintaining the current building load requirement.

VAV System Optimization

As each Variable Air Volume terminal controls the space temperature – based on flow – the “worst case” zone can easily be identified by an automation system. The supply fan speed can be reduced by resetting the static pressure (see following page). As the load drops and the fan meets a preset minimum flow, the system resets the air temperature up, so less chilled water is needed. In a variable flow chiller system, this reduces pumping energy.

If the system load continues to drop, the system will reset the chiller supply water temperature upward which will then reduce the energy requirements of the chiller. Changes in the chiller head pressure and loads can then reset the cooling tower fan speed.

The key to optimizing the system operation is communication and information sharing through the entire system equipment. With the reduced cost of variable frequency drives and Building Automation Systems, (BAS) complete system optimization can be implemented as a cost effective option.

In VAV systems where the individual VAV boxes and the AHU are on a building automation system, additional savings can be achieved by implementing static pressure reset. The static pressure sensor in a VAV system is typically located two-thirds of the way downstream in the main supply air duct for many existing systems. Static pressure is maintained by modulating the fan speed.

When the static pressure is lower than the setpoint, the fan speeds up to provide more airflow (static) to meet the VAV box needs, and vice-versa. A constant set point value is usually used regardless of the building load conditions.

Under partial-load conditions the static pressure required at the terminal VAV boxes may be far less than this constant set point. The individual boxes will assume a damper position to satisfy the space temperature requirements. For example, various VAV box dampers will be at different damper positions, (some at 70% open, 60% open, etc) very few will be at design, ie 95% -100% open.

RESET STRATEGY
Essentially, resetting supply air static pressure requires that every VAV box is sampled with the static reset set to the worst case box requirement. For example, each box is polled, every 5 minutes. If no box is more than 95% open, reduce duct static pressure set point by 5%. If one or more boxes exceed 95% open, increase static pressure set point by 5%.

With a lower static set point to maintain, fan speed reduces. The result is increased energy savings in the 3 to 8% range. See figure below. If the BAS system is already installed, implementing this strategy is relatively free.
Variable Air Volume System energy savings