Iacdrive|Automation Solution

UPS systems commissioning test and inspection procedures

The UPS systems commissioning test and inspection procedures are to conform to;

• BS EN 50091-1:1993 – Specification for Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS). General and Safety Requirements, AND

• IEC 62040-3 (Draft Edition – 2) in particular the Efficiency test procedures outlined in its “Annexure-J”.

These procedures to include:

1. Visual Inspection:
a. Visually inspect all equipment for signs of damage or foreign materials.
b. Observe the type of ventilation, the cleanliness of the room, the use of proper signs, and any other safety related factors.

2. Mechanical Inspection:
a. Check all the power connections for tightness.
b. Check all the control wiring terminations and plugs for tightness or proper seating.

3. Electrical Pre-check:
a. Check the DC bus for a possible short circuit.
b. Check input and Bypass power for proper voltages and phase rotation.
c. Check all lamp test functions.

4. Initial UPS Startup:
a. Verify that all the alarms are in a “go” condition.
b. Energize the UPS module and verify the proper DC, walkup, and AC phase on.
c. Check the DC link holding voltage, AC output voltages, and output waveforms.
d. Check the final DC link voltage and Inverter AC output. Adjust if required.
e. Check for the proper synchronization.
f. Check for the voltage difference between the Inverter output and the Bypass source.
g. Perform full-load, step-load, and battery discharge tests using supplier furnished load bank.

Why your project failed?

I have contracted with lots of different groups and moving within the same company to save failed projects or project in trouble or impossible to implement and helped these groups to achieve company goal. What I have noticed is that less the managers or groups know less they realize more knowledge or experience can help them. Less they know, less they understand they need help because they don’t know what they need. They think they are just fine until it is too late and a group or company goes under because of it.

I give you an example of one of the project I worked on at Nortel. I was assigned to write project specification for a product working with a director group with 100 designers and testers. During my research to get information to write the product specification I discover deficiency in the hardware they wanted to use that would cause the system reliability and availability unacceptable to the customer and did not meet customer requirement. I proposed design change in one of the interface card and firmware used in the system. The management did not agree with me on this item so I refused to write the specification the way they want it to not expose this deficiency. We had a large meeting with the president of the company with 20 people in that meeting looking at two different presentation to see if they need to change direction or stay on course and move me out of the way to another project activity. I am not the greatest in politics and making things look good when they are not.

The result was that I was moved to different project for 1 year implementing and releasing one more product that made the company lots of money. After a year development, they complete the project and released it to the customer. The customer starts validating the product and had lots of the test cases failing in the area that I proposed to change.
This was a large project and lots of money involve. The customer rejected the product and they went back on the drawing board after getting lots of this equipment on order for this project. The management came back to me and one of my team members to come back to the team and help.

Me and my team member both having experience over 15 years at that point came back and have a solution designing a new complex interface card with microcode firmware and some software to save the project. I and he had to work for 4 months for day and night having design review between two of us at 3 am in the cafeteria to get it done (defining specification to validated working product).

This project was completed and customer accepted this solution. The director group was dismantled and all people in the group were laid off and absolved in other groups in the company and some in the same group. The management groups were smart people with good intention, they were with software background and good intention for the project. They just did not have the knowledge and background to manage the system and hardware level because of lake of knowledge and experience in that area.

You see this in lots of companies when a software designer or manager is successful in their area, they get promoted and manage groups that are out of their area and lots of time they destroy groups or project because of not having the background to identify good or bad direction to go. You will always have engineers to not agree with each other and managements have to make decision to go one way or another. The wrong decision in these cases can destroy a project or company. Not all engineers can present a case in 1 hour to sell you their point of view, Remember they are not lawyer or sales man, they are engineers. So what do you do, Follow the sales man or lawyer to save your project or the reason to drive your decision and if you don’t have the knowledge or experience to lesson to the reason then you will make the wrong decision.

What if

Many years ago we used to call this the “what ifs?”. Part of the design phase is when we model what we think the system is meant to do. Just as important is how the system is meant to react when things are not going well, the abnormal situations or what ifs?

Your client will tell you how their machine or process works, well he will describe how he thinks it works. This is OK as a starting point but we need to consider the scenarios of “what If” something goes wrong? Scenarios is also a good word as scenarios paint a situation that can be described to the customer for his comment.

For example on a compressor control project what if the lube oil pump fails on the compressor, how do we alarm this to the Operator, should we trip the compressor or do we start the back-up oil pump (if there is one). As you look at the system you can pick out various components and generate likely scenarios that you can discuss with the client. Using this approach gives more of a real world feel to your client meetings that are likely to generate a deeper insight into how the system is meant to work.

All scenarios do not have to be centered around abnormal situations but can also relate to things that need to be considered as part of normal operation. For example we might look at how a duty/standby pump system works? One scenario might relate to duty pump failure but another scenario might consider rotating the duty and standby pumps to even out wear and tear? You might also have manual mode and auto mode scenarios to consider?

What you have to remember is that most clients are not control systems experts. They might and probably will struggle with flow charts or any other pseudo code expression type formats that describe how you think the client’s system is meant to work? You have to tailor your approach to match your audience and that is also very important when you produce your documentation, you do not want to lose valuable information just because the client doesn’t fully understand what you are trying to tell him? Also make sure that you spend time with your client. Walk the client through your design, do this face to face as much as possible and do it more than once! Getting feedback on a regular basis helps to eliminate the dreaded word “REWORK”! Also taking this partnership approach builds a good relationship with your client.

For the machine builders your client might be in your own company? Remember same company or not they are your client and your success in no small way depends on your relationship with them.

Add the modes of operation and abnormal situations to your system model and develop the methods of how you will flag these situations to the Operator and Maintenance Engineer. Alarm Management is dealt with by EEMUA 191. If you do nothing else then read this document it will help you to set up alarm workshops, alarm reviews, alarm prioritization and rationalization and how to develop an effective alarm management structure for your system.

Benefits of Having products and services in the same company

Having products and services in the same company can either be treated as an opportunity or as a constraint. I strongly believe that having services and products in the same company should be treated as an opportunity, and that any potential constraints should be eliminated.

Here are the things that I have learned.

First: Never limit the product sales to the capacity of your service organization:
I see some companies that develop products that are so great that they want to be the only organization delivering, implementing and maintaining them. They believe that the products are a competitive advantage that will allow them to dominate the services market. This almost always fails; your example from Xerox is one of many. One of two things tend to happen: Either the product does not reach its full market potential due to limited services capacity, or the product organization limits their innovation and product development so that it can continue a lucrative services business. Both may be good short term, but fails on a longer term basis.
My recommendation is that companies that have both products and services should allow their products to be delivered, implemented and maintained by other companies that compete with themselves in the services market.

Second: Never limit the services that you offer to the products that you have in your own portfolio:
Service organizations are typically focused on delivering, implementing and maintaining solutions for their customers. They deliver more than just the product. If you limit the services to only focus on the products in the in-house portfolio, then you are either going to miss opportunities to sell services or you are going to get a portfolio that is too broad. Neither of them is good.
My recommendation is that companies that have both products and services should allow their services organization to deliver products from everywhere, even products that directly compete with the products in their own portfolio. This will ensure that the services organization stays competitive.

Third: Leverage the synergies between products and services:
You may ask “why have both products and services in the same organization if they need to be kept separate?”. The answer lies in the synergies. Companies need to create a culture where the product and services organizations can collaborate even though they are independent. Good organizations can make good decisions about when to expand their own portfolio and when to solve the same customer problems through services and/or third party products. I have seen great innovations come from organizations that master this.

Having products and services in the same organization creates a great foundation for innovation. The key to success is to have the right company culture.

System operation

Our PSA unit (meaning Pressure Swing Adsorption) uses 5 adsorption vessels. The process itself is a batch process, but in order to run in a continuous process plant, each of the 5 vessels can complete all the adsorption process but at the same time, each of them is in a different status of the sequence (i.e. gas in, gas out, adsorption, pressurizing, depressurizing, cleaning, etc). The sequence is mainly controlled by time and pressure condition in each step of the sequence, by managing several valves (I think 5 by vessel, but I’m not sure right now).

Panel operator experienced some problems with valve 1 (gas entry) in vessel 2 because it should open but immediately it received the close command. Instruments technician check that orders coming from the DCS were OK, and also check the valves by injecting the open order, so, they and operation staff concluded that “the program has some kind of problem”.

Some time ago, I spent a lot of time studying the operation manual of this unit and the code written to control it and I wrote a document merging both knowledge. In page 9, I described a condition (an exclusive pressure difference between vessel and gas coming in the vessel) avoiding valve 1 opening during adsorption stage. I explained this condition to operation staff and they confirm that the values were right and that the excessive delta P really exist so, the decided to check back the valve 1 (already checked), discovering a problem (the stem moved, but the disk not).

Conclusion:
– If operation staff know properly the process, they know about this condition, but this could be solved with a properly designed HMI (i.e. including and alarm indicating “valve 1 closed by excessive deltaP”).
– The initial inspection of the valve didn’t show anything wrong, but stem and disk were disconnected.
– If we didn’t dig into the code, this problem, solved in less of an hour could take several hours.

DC Drives Parameter Setting / Programming

Programming parameters associated with DC drives are extensive & similar to those used in conjunction with AC drives. An operator’s panel is used for programming of control setup & operating parameters for a DC drive.

SPEED SETPOINT
This signal is derived from a closely regulated fixed voltage source applied to a potentiometer. The potentiometer has the capability of accepting the fixed voltage & dividing it down to any value, For example, 10 to 0 V, depending on where it’s set. A 10-V input to the drive from the speed potentiometer corresponds to maximum motor speed & 0 V corresponds to zero speed. Similarly any speed between zero & maximum can be obtained by adjusting the speed control to the appropriate setting.

SPEED FEEDBACK INFORMATION
In order to “close the loop” & control motor speed accurately, it’s necessary to provide the control with a feed back signal related to motor speed. The standard method of doing this in a simple control is by monitoring the armature voltage & feeding it back into the drive for comparison with the input setpoint signal. The armature voltage feedback system is generally known as a voltage regulated drive.

A second & more accurate method of obtaining the motor speed feedback information is from a motor mounted tachometer. The output of this tachometer is directly related to the speed of the motor. When tachometer feedback is used, the drive is referred to as a speed regulated drive.

In some newer high-performance digital drives, the feedback can come from a motor-mounted encoder that feeds back voltage pulses at a rate related to motor speed.

These pulses are counted & processed digitally & compared to the setpoint, an error signal is produced to regulate the armature voltage & speed.

CURRENT FEEDBACK INFORMATION
The second source of feedback information is obtained by monitoring the motor armature current. This is an accurate indication of the torque required by the load.

The current feedback signal is used to eliminate the speed droop that normally would occur with increased torque load on the motor & to limit the current to a value that will protect the power semiconductors from damage. The current-limiting action of most controls is adjustable & is usually called current limit or torque limit.

MINIMUM SPEED
In most cases, when the controller is initially installed the speed potentiometer can be turned down to its lowest point & the output voltage from the controller will go to zero, causing the motor to stop. There are, how ever, situations where this is not desirable. E.g.,, there are some applications that may need to be kept running at a minimum speed & accelerated up to operating speed as necessary. The typical minimum speed adjustment is from 0 to 30 percent of motor base speed.

MAXIMUM SPEED
The maximum speed adjustment sets the maximum speed attainable. In some cases it’s desirable to limit the motor speed (and machine speed) to something less than would be available at this maximum setting. The maximum adjustment allows this to be done.

IR COMPENSATION
Although a typical DC motor presents a mostly inductive load, there is always a small amount of fixed resistance in the armature circuit. IR compensation is a method used to adjust for the drop in a motor’s speed due to armature resistance. This helps stabilize the motor’s speed from a no-load to full-load condition. IR compensation should be applied only to voltage-regulated drives.

ACCELERATION TIME
As its name implies, the acceleration time adjustment will extend o

How to improve troubleshooting techniques?

The guy asked for suggestions on how to improve troubleshooting techniques. I mentioned this earlier as a “suggestion” for starters but the idea got lost in all the complaining and totally irrelevant responses like the one above.

Proper lay out of inputs and outputs and a “Troubleshooting guide” or flow chart. I have an Aris cablem modem and Netgear wireless router for internet If loose Internet service I can do three things.

A. Pick up the phone, call tech support and wait two days for someone to show up

B. Take them apart and ‘DIG INTO THE PROGRAMMING”

C. Read the instructions someone took the time to write. Before I can get an output identified by the LEDs, I have to have the correct inputs identified by the LEDs. It’s a waste of time tearing in the “programming” over a loose cable connection somewhere. Same for the wireless router and a bad LAN cable connection or network service issue on the computer. I’m already familiar with the proper LEDs for normal operation. When one goes out it gives me an idea where to start looking before even opening up the instructions which I’ve downloaded in PDFs for quick access to their “troubleshooting” guides. Maybe the service is off line – there is an LED for that. No TVs either, no service or common upstream cable connection problem, no-brainier. The first thing a Xfinity service tech does is go outside and look for a signal at the house customer jack. It’s either in his cable or my house. Once their cable had to be replaced. It mysteriously got damaged right after AT&T dug a big hole in my backyard to upgrade their Uverse service – go figure.

In order to get something to operate output wise, you need a certain amount of inputs to get it. If you don’t have a particular output, then look at the trouble shooing guide and see what inputs are required for it. If there are four direct sensor inputs required for a particular output, group them together.

Grouping internal interlocks together helps also when digging into a program like ladder logic instead of hopping through pages of diagrams or text to find everything it takes to get one output. It’s a common program development issues to throw in ideas as you program depending on where you are sequentially.

What is SynRM motor?

Many others thirty years ago, synchronous reluctance motors (SynRM) have finally replacing the traditional AC induction motors in the industry. ABB has claimed achieving IE4 efficiency with SynRM, a great improvement from IE2 efficiency with the traditional induction motors, for the same motor envelope size and input power.

A SynRM is a true AC machine with or without permanent magnets on the rotor. It is totally different from the closed-loop controlled, permanent magnet brushless DC machines (BLDC) in that one would never be able to get rid of torque ripples as that have been achieved in commonly used BLDC machines.

The difference is on the rotor: copper or aluminum bars for inductance motor (squirrel cage after joining end disks) vs. flux barriers (air pockets) in SynRM. The SynRM rotor can be further enhanced by inserting permanent magnets in the air pockets for a machines called PM assisted SynRM. High efficiency is achieved for two reasons: 1) no copper loss due to the lack of rotor bars and end disks; and 2) high inductance difference between d- and q-axes (Ld-Lq) because of flux barriers and motor torque linearly proportional to (Ld-Lq).

In comparison with the traditional AC induction motor, a SynRM motor needs a frequency inverter and when permanent magnets are present in the rotor, a rotor position feedback sensor. The drawbacks of SynRM are the motor torque ripples due to switching operation, inherited small air gap, etc.

Special Protection System Advantages and Disadvantages

Quite a few yrs. ago around 1988, I was a Protection and Control Engineer at a large utility in the SE. We were doing our planning to bring the final unit of a large 4 unit plant on line, when it was discovered that we could encounter some unusual instability scenarios. The funny thing was that with all units on-line and above a certain MW output, all that would need to occur would be opening of a remote 500kV breaker on one of the particular lines and the event could trigger, eventually bringing ALL 4 units at the plant out-of-step and tripping off all of the generation in just a few minutes (3600 MW).

The studies were performed numerous times by internal and external experts but the results were always the same. The key problem seemed to be the existing network configuration of 4 units and only 3 transmission lines. Adding a 4th 500kV line from the plant seemed to cure the problem under all conditions, including close in 3 phase faults with breaker failure. Unfortunately, the cost and timeline to build a new t-line was a real challenge!

In order to proceed with commissioning the 4th unit and remediating any scenarios for tripping all generation, a Special Protection System (SPS) was developed. A transfer trip channel was installed at the remote substation, keying on the breaker contact opening. At the plant, a Unit Trip scheme was installed that had a MW meter supervising tripping of any one unit selected by the plant operator (U1-U2-U3-U4). If all units were on line and generation was above 2500 MW (margin of safety added), then a receipt of remote breaker opening would trip the selected unit to avoid having all units cascade into out-of-step condition.

Advantages: Clearly, this Special Protection System saved the day, and bought time until an additional line was added 4 years later.

Disadvantages: The downside was the challenge of installing and testing such a complicated scheme with the potential for mis-operation. I don’t recall any mis-operations occurring, but it was still a bit “dicey”. I have been at that same plant during a full load unit trip (Generator differential) and it was an “exciting” experience to say the least! While I did recommend that we conduct a “live test” to see what would really happen and perhaps test our system BLACK START procedures, this suggestion was not well received by management (LOL).

This was my only encounter with such a special protection system scheme in my 35 years of utility work, but it was very interesting to be involved with this project.

TIA portal, a nightmare!

I have been using TIA since it was launched and it has come on leaps and bounds since it was first launched. Its a great tool and as already mentioned it has its bad aspects but it also has its good aspects. The biggest improvement (in my opinion) is the drag and drop functionality in the WinCC part and the code editor. Just need a field PG to be launched with screens to fold out so you can have multiple screen!!

They are moving in the right direction and it was always going to be resource hungry WinCC was bad enough for that in previous versions.

New improvements make a long list but one of the most recent is being able to switch a DB to and from optimised. How many times in previous versions did I forget to check the box then have to delete the DB and create it again. PID loop tuning function within TIA is useful and if you look on the Siemens Automation website (UK/Europe) the example files are growing all the time and they have some great examples that can be integrated easily in to application, I have used the ASi maintenance and monitoring example which was very well put together along with a few others. Even if you don’t use them but need some pointers on which way to go they are a good starting point.

I could list the gripes I have, but all in all its coming together nicely, just need a decent well priced Field PG to run it on £5K is a bit steep for an M4 which maybe no great improvement on the M3 which, in my opinion, wasn’t very good.

Few months ago I had a project with TIA Portal v11. Hardware targets: Simatic S7-300 and Simatic Comfort Panels.
Compared to RSLogix 5000 / FactoryTalk View for example, TIA Portal is a nightmare, especially on commissioning and start-up, when the pressure is huge and you have to work FAST.

The main problems:
1. Very slow on every operation (compiling, downloading, on-line editing, project printing/documenting).
2. Requires a very high resolution display (it is almost unusable on a 1366×768 laptop)

3. Weird behavior (HMI display alterations, crashes).