Iacdrive|Automation Solution

DC Drives QUIZ

1. List three types of operations where DC drives are commonly found.

2. How can the speed of a DC motor be varied?

3. What are the two main functions of the SCR semi conductors used in a DC drive power converter?

4. Explain how SCR phase angle control operates to vary the DC output from an SCR.

5. Armature-voltage-controlled DC drives are classified as constant-torque drives. What does this mean?

6. Why is three-phase AC power, rather than single phase, used to power most commercial & industrial DC drives?

7. List what input line & output load voltage information must be specified for a DC drive.

8. How can the speed of a DC motor be increased above that of its base speed?

9. Why must field loss protection be provided for all DC drives?

10. Compare the braking capabilities of nonregenerative & regenerative DC drives.

11. A regenerative DC drive requires two sets of power bridges. Why?

12. Explain what is meant by an overhauling load.

13. What are the advantages of regenerative braking versus dynamic braking?

14. How is the desired speed of a drive normally set?

15. List three methods used by DC drives to send feed back information from the motor back to the drive regulator.

16. What functions require monitoring of the motor armature current?

17. Under what operating condition would the mini mum speed adjustment parameter be utilized?

18. Under what operating condition would the maxi mum speed adjustment parameter be utilized?

19. IR compensation is a parameter found in most DC drives. What is its purpose?

20. What, in addition to the time it takes for the motor to go from zero to set speed, does acceleration time regulate?

Industrial Ethernet vs. Fieldbus technologies

Where we really need digital communication networking, in my personal opinion, is down at the sensor/transmitter and positioner/actuator/valve level to take the place of 4-20 mA and on/off signals. Down at the level 1 of the Purdue reference model you need a fieldbus, not one of the “H2” types of fieldbus, but one of the “H1” types of fieldbus. When first introduced, these technologies were not as fast and not as easy to use has they could have been, but after many years of refinement these technologies are finally becoming sufficiently easy for most plants to use.

An “H1 fieldbus” is the most practical way to digitally network sensors/transmitters and positioners/actuators/valves to the DCS. Options include FOUNDATION fieldbus H1, PROFIBUS-PA, CompoNet, ASI, and IO-link. These protocols can take the place of 4-20 mA and on/off signals.

Note that “H1 fieldbus” should not be confused with the very different “H2 fieldbus” category of protocols used at level 1-1/2 of the Purdue reference model to connect remote-I/O,

Operate low speed generator and high speed generator in the same terminal

Can we operate low speed generator and high speed generator in the same terminal? Is there a mechanical effect?

First, specify that this is an isolated system with two generators feeding the same bus. Operation of an isolated system is different than a grid connected system, and the mode setting of the governors have to be set to accommodate this. Depending upon the prime mover type and governor model, improper tuning will manifest itself in speed variations. The size of the two machines relative to each other, as well as their size relative to the load, can have measurable impact as well. The best way to tell whether it is mechanical or electrical in nature is to look at the time-frame of the phenomena relative to the time constants of the various control and response loops.

Second, “…In large power system, generators are not connected in the same terminal…” is not generally true, there are many power plants where multiple generators feed the same bus before the power is utilized.

Third, “…frequency oscillation is about 1.5-2 Hz…”, if you mean that the frequency swings between 48 and 52 Hz routinely, that usually indicates a governor setup/tuning problem or a non-uniform load.

Fourth, reactive current compensation takes place in quadrature from real power and should have minimal effect on real power and only affect the terminal voltage if not set properly. Droop compensation is the means for ensuring that the AVRs do not fight with each other since you cannot have two independent controllers attempting to control the same control variable.

Fifth, regarding different types of prime movers, some are inherently more likely to induce mechanical vibrations, especially reciprocating engines, especially if they are not all of the same size and/or number of cylinders. The same is true of the loads, non-uniform, cyclic loads can cause very severe problems especially on isolated systems where the load is a significant percentage of the prime movers’ output power. The analysis of, and solution to, such problems is an interesting area of study.

Power industry engineers

The power industry has many tentacles. Energy production is one key subset, the design, manufacture, installation and operation of hydro, nuclear, fossil, renewables, etc is continuing to grow especially in the renewable area. Then there is the transmission of energy which includes the design/manufacture/construction/maintenance of substations, protection and control systems, overhead and underground lines, series and shunt compensation, etc. Last there is the distribution of the energy to the customers at the lower voltages which includes many of the transmission opportunities but introduces other niche areas like power quality, smart metering, distributed generation, etc.

It’s not as simple as stating you want a PHD in the power industry with hands on experience without first knowing the ins and outs of the business. As has been previously mentioned, get your BS in EE with a slant toward power. Get a job in a utility and learn the business top to bottom so you can actually make an intelligent decision on what area of the business floats your boat. Once you know that then pursue an advanced degree in that specific area (the real bonus is most companies will pay for it).

UPS systems commissioning test and inspection procedures

The UPS systems commissioning test and inspection procedures are to conform to;

• BS EN 50091-1:1993 – Specification for Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS). General and Safety Requirements, AND

• IEC 62040-3 (Draft Edition – 2) in particular the Efficiency test procedures outlined in its “Annexure-J”.

These procedures to include:

1. Visual Inspection:
a. Visually inspect all equipment for signs of damage or foreign materials.
b. Observe the type of ventilation, the cleanliness of the room, the use of proper signs, and any other safety related factors.

2. Mechanical Inspection:
a. Check all the power connections for tightness.
b. Check all the control wiring terminations and plugs for tightness or proper seating.

3. Electrical Pre-check:
a. Check the DC bus for a possible short circuit.
b. Check input and Bypass power for proper voltages and phase rotation.
c. Check all lamp test functions.

4. Initial UPS Startup:
a. Verify that all the alarms are in a “go” condition.
b. Energize the UPS module and verify the proper DC, walkup, and AC phase on.
c. Check the DC link holding voltage, AC output voltages, and output waveforms.
d. Check the final DC link voltage and Inverter AC output. Adjust if required.
e. Check for the proper synchronization.
f. Check for the voltage difference between the Inverter output and the Bypass source.
g. Perform full-load, step-load, and battery discharge tests using supplier furnished load bank.

Why your project failed?

I have contracted with lots of different groups and moving within the same company to save failed projects or project in trouble or impossible to implement and helped these groups to achieve company goal. What I have noticed is that less the managers or groups know less they realize more knowledge or experience can help them. Less they know, less they understand they need help because they don’t know what they need. They think they are just fine until it is too late and a group or company goes under because of it.

I give you an example of one of the project I worked on at Nortel. I was assigned to write project specification for a product working with a director group with 100 designers and testers. During my research to get information to write the product specification I discover deficiency in the hardware they wanted to use that would cause the system reliability and availability unacceptable to the customer and did not meet customer requirement. I proposed design change in one of the interface card and firmware used in the system. The management did not agree with me on this item so I refused to write the specification the way they want it to not expose this deficiency. We had a large meeting with the president of the company with 20 people in that meeting looking at two different presentation to see if they need to change direction or stay on course and move me out of the way to another project activity. I am not the greatest in politics and making things look good when they are not.

The result was that I was moved to different project for 1 year implementing and releasing one more product that made the company lots of money. After a year development, they complete the project and released it to the customer. The customer starts validating the product and had lots of the test cases failing in the area that I proposed to change.
This was a large project and lots of money involve. The customer rejected the product and they went back on the drawing board after getting lots of this equipment on order for this project. The management came back to me and one of my team members to come back to the team and help.

Me and my team member both having experience over 15 years at that point came back and have a solution designing a new complex interface card with microcode firmware and some software to save the project. I and he had to work for 4 months for day and night having design review between two of us at 3 am in the cafeteria to get it done (defining specification to validated working product).

This project was completed and customer accepted this solution. The director group was dismantled and all people in the group were laid off and absolved in other groups in the company and some in the same group. The management groups were smart people with good intention, they were with software background and good intention for the project. They just did not have the knowledge and background to manage the system and hardware level because of lake of knowledge and experience in that area.

You see this in lots of companies when a software designer or manager is successful in their area, they get promoted and manage groups that are out of their area and lots of time they destroy groups or project because of not having the background to identify good or bad direction to go. You will always have engineers to not agree with each other and managements have to make decision to go one way or another. The wrong decision in these cases can destroy a project or company. Not all engineers can present a case in 1 hour to sell you their point of view, Remember they are not lawyer or sales man, they are engineers. So what do you do, Follow the sales man or lawyer to save your project or the reason to drive your decision and if you don’t have the knowledge or experience to lesson to the reason then you will make the wrong decision.

What if

Many years ago we used to call this the “what ifs?”. Part of the design phase is when we model what we think the system is meant to do. Just as important is how the system is meant to react when things are not going well, the abnormal situations or what ifs?

Your client will tell you how their machine or process works, well he will describe how he thinks it works. This is OK as a starting point but we need to consider the scenarios of “what If” something goes wrong? Scenarios is also a good word as scenarios paint a situation that can be described to the customer for his comment.

For example on a compressor control project what if the lube oil pump fails on the compressor, how do we alarm this to the Operator, should we trip the compressor or do we start the back-up oil pump (if there is one). As you look at the system you can pick out various components and generate likely scenarios that you can discuss with the client. Using this approach gives more of a real world feel to your client meetings that are likely to generate a deeper insight into how the system is meant to work.

All scenarios do not have to be centered around abnormal situations but can also relate to things that need to be considered as part of normal operation. For example we might look at how a duty/standby pump system works? One scenario might relate to duty pump failure but another scenario might consider rotating the duty and standby pumps to even out wear and tear? You might also have manual mode and auto mode scenarios to consider?

What you have to remember is that most clients are not control systems experts. They might and probably will struggle with flow charts or any other pseudo code expression type formats that describe how you think the client’s system is meant to work? You have to tailor your approach to match your audience and that is also very important when you produce your documentation, you do not want to lose valuable information just because the client doesn’t fully understand what you are trying to tell him? Also make sure that you spend time with your client. Walk the client through your design, do this face to face as much as possible and do it more than once! Getting feedback on a regular basis helps to eliminate the dreaded word “REWORK”! Also taking this partnership approach builds a good relationship with your client.

For the machine builders your client might be in your own company? Remember same company or not they are your client and your success in no small way depends on your relationship with them.

Add the modes of operation and abnormal situations to your system model and develop the methods of how you will flag these situations to the Operator and Maintenance Engineer. Alarm Management is dealt with by EEMUA 191. If you do nothing else then read this document it will help you to set up alarm workshops, alarm reviews, alarm prioritization and rationalization and how to develop an effective alarm management structure for your system.

Negative Impact of Accelerated Depreciation on the Indian Economy

For argument sake or as an illustration, if we assume that 1 MW solar will generate 1.6 Mkwh and rs. 1.2/kwh is rebate for AD taken by the investor = 16 x 1.2 = Rs. 19.2 lakhs/year

[Now, Adani and Tata Power have been negotiating the firm Contract PPA to get more, like wise biomass people who based their PPA on LCOE, but, are asking more money from Government, hence, Solar PV developers may also follow the same route after few years, wherein this rebate of AD given will not have any meaning!!]

Total rebate given = 19.2/year x 25 years = Rs. 480 lakhs = Rs. 4.8 Crore (that too year wise depreciated / devaluated rupee value, which has no meaning !)

But, the tax saved is = 80% of investment = 0.8 x 10 cr = 8 Crore, upfront, right in the first year, which is great value, which government would have used as Equity to develop many more MWs.

Is this POLICY of providing 80% Accelerated Depreciation correct by any standards and why Finance Secretaries or policy makers can’t take note and issue corrective measure for INDIA FIRST Culture??

MNRE, in its Draft policy has proposed 20 to 40% Viability Gap Funding, which will further worsen the LOSS to the government !!

If Mahagenco (with 50% subsidy) goes ahead with the proposed business model, then, how and why State and hence Central government has to take the burden due to such errant policies??
We must put an end to the Scrupulous Project Development, which avails the Capital Subsidy (or Viability Gap Funding) and the Accelerated Depreciation and then the Promoters Sell the Project to a prospective buyer, who in turn approaches the Government for the Tariff hike in the 25 years tenure (please note the Politics dynamics or change of administrative set up will hamper the sustainability), thus, the nation is a great loser

Policies and the enabling tax advantages to few promoters (who claimed Capital Subsidy without creating good quality asset or with NON functional biomass power plants) have made a big dent on Indian Economy without any good results esp in Renewable energy sector.

Government or its administration through such policy (without checks or being accountable) transferred the Public Property to the Private Companies in the Form of Renewable Energy Generation through Capital Subsidy (or Viability Gap Funding) coupled with Accelerated Depreciation along with Low cost Debt fund to these Corporate companies (like EXIM etc) / Project Developers – entrepreneurs, which are not paid back as few of these projects are not functioning and still no action taken to recover the Capital Subsidy paid or Tax recovery which was availed through Accelerated Depreciation (AD).

If Government would have established all these projects from the Tax collections (which are doled out as free through AD), it would have needed only a fraction i.e only Rs. 51,504 Crores, which could have been managed from the taxes of Rs.137,344 Crores while retaining the land and property in Government’s name and could have generated lot of employment.

But, by giving an opportunity to Private sector, many have failed to deliver and no Action to recover the Capital Subsidy or the Debt (due to Tribunals etc…. Please be informed that Indian Parliament had to pass an act in Dec 2012 to recover debt (through wrong business cases of Project Promoters, approved by many banks which were certified by National and International Advisors or Consultants) which is around a whopping 40 Billion USD!!)

Total estimated Renewable energy project capacity = 12% of total installed 220GW = 26000 MW
Cost/ MW Investment Equity Debt Cap Sub AD
Source MW installed Total 30% 70% Rs(Cr) 80%adj
Biomass 6 4,500 27,000 8,100 18,900 6,750 21,600

Wind 7 20,160 131,040 39,312 91,728 104,832

Solar PV 10 1,300 13,000 3,900 9,100 VGF? 10,400
(Ground)

India renewable energy

Refer to the REI seminar, wherein Government of India representative stated that the VGF payment is spread over 5 year period.

1) Any profit Making Company, must have had the benefits from the Government (subsidies etc) / Eco system.

The profit must be taxed for the improvement of the Economy of the Country.

2) Present renewable energy policy is allowing these profit making companies to avoid paying taxes, and own the assets due to such FREE EQUITY, which belongs to the Government, thus Accelerated Depreciation (AD) is a killer of Economy.

Thus, we are unable to develop the NICHE technology as unrelated industries are owning the project due to avoidance of paying taxes and just to own the assets due to such loop hole in the policy, later making an early exit to make quick money without serving the Nation.

AD promotion is not a level playing field apart from Tax loss to the Government.

3) The Tax thus saved, is again allowed to earn 19 to 24% Return On Equity (ROE), which is very unfair (actually this should have been disallowed to have rs.3/kwh less tariff), due to a fact that, this is public money, hence, should not be allowed to have such wind fall gains.

4) By loading ROE, showing high CAPEX and taking back more than 30% project equity, getting EXIM Bank or such low cost funding to reduce the interest burden, but, Tariff claimed of rs.18 or 15 or 10/kwh is once again a kind of Tariff subsidy, thus, a common man is paying more money for RE power tariff, which is a great killer of economy and making people poor.

5) Viability Gap funding in addition to AD will be an Economic suicide as a project promoter will be allowed to take back 60 to 70% of project cost without paying tax on profit earned !!

This is likely encourage poor equipment buying / its maintenance due to such immediate undue / windfall gains.

6) Despite taking such huge wind fall gains, again these project promoters will be allowed to sell the project to others, to make further wind fall gain to make few existing companies to get undue benefits due to such wrong policy guidelines, despite many representations made to the Government, which states that they have go clearance from Finance Ministry to further ruin the Economy !!

What is SynRM motor?

Many others thirty years ago, synchronous reluctance motors (SynRM) have finally replacing the traditional AC induction motors in the industry. ABB has claimed achieving IE4 efficiency with SynRM, a great improvement from IE2 efficiency with the traditional induction motors, for the same motor envelope size and input power.

A SynRM is a true AC machine with or without permanent magnets on the rotor. It is totally different from the closed-loop controlled, permanent magnet brushless DC machines (BLDC) in that one would never be able to get rid of torque ripples as that have been achieved in commonly used BLDC machines.

The difference is on the rotor: copper or aluminum bars for inductance motor (squirrel cage after joining end disks) vs. flux barriers (air pockets) in SynRM. The SynRM rotor can be further enhanced by inserting permanent magnets in the air pockets for a machines called PM assisted SynRM. High efficiency is achieved for two reasons: 1) no copper loss due to the lack of rotor bars and end disks; and 2) high inductance difference between d- and q-axes (Ld-Lq) because of flux barriers and motor torque linearly proportional to (Ld-Lq).

In comparison with the traditional AC induction motor, a SynRM motor needs a frequency inverter and when permanent magnets are present in the rotor, a rotor position feedback sensor. The drawbacks of SynRM are the motor torque ripples due to switching operation, inherited small air gap, etc.