Iacdrive|Automation Solution

Negative sequence

• By :
• May 26, 2016
• Iacdrive_blog

Negative sequence will not cause a physical rotation. This component creates a field which, though not strong enough, tries to counter the primary field, An increase in this component will cause the motor to overheat due to the opposition. a physical rotation is not likely to occur.

Negative sequence currents are produced because of the unbalanced currents in the power system. Flow of negative sequence currents in electrical machines (generators and motors) are undesirable as these currents generates high temperatures in very short time. The negative sequence component has a phase sequence opposite to that of the motor and represents the amount of unbalance in the feeder. Unbalanced currents will generate negative sequence components which in turn produces a reverse rotating filed (opposite to the synchronous rotating filed normally induces emf in to the rotor windings) in the air gap between the stator and rotor of the machines. This reverse rotating magnetic field rotates at synchronous speeds but in opposite direction to the rotor of the machine. This component does not produce useful power, however by being present it contributes to the losses and causes temperature rise. This heating effect in turn results in the loss of mechanical integrity or insulation failures in electrical machines within seconds. Therefore it is undeniable to operate the machine during unbalanced condition when negative sequence currents flows in the rotor and motor to be protected. Phase reversal will make the motor run in the opposite direction and can be very dangerous, resulting in severe damage to gear boxes and hazard to operating personnel.

Why companies don’t invest in variable frequency drive control

• By :
• May 26, 2016
• Iacdrive_blog

Investing in energy efficient variable frequency drives (VFD) seems like an obvious path to cutting a company’s operating costs, but it is one that many companies ignore. This article explores some possible reasons for this reluctance to invest in VFD.

There is a goldmine of savings waiting to be unlocked by controlling electric motors, but the reluctance to take advantage of this is a very puzzling phenomenon. Motors consume about two thirds of all electrical energy used by industry and cost 40 times more to run than to buy, so you would think optimizing their efficiency would be a priority. The reality is that this good idea is not always turned into good practice and many businesses are missing out on one of the best opportunities to boost profits and variable frequency drive growth.

It might surprise you to learn that your average 11kW motor may cost about £500 to buy but £120,000 to run at 8,000 hours per year over a 15-year lifetime (and that isn’t even accounting for inevitable increases in energy prices). It’s worth considering the payback on any investment in motor control that will reduce this significant running cost, such as using VFDs to control speed, or implementing automated starting and stopping when the motor is not needed. Payback times can often be less than 1 year and, of course, the savings continue over the lifetime of the system, particularly as energy costs rise.

The question that often arises when I talk about this subject to people is: “If the savings are so great, why don’t more people do this?” It would appear to be something that fits into the nobrainer category, however there are three main barriers to the wider uptake of motor control with variable frequency drive, none of which should stop common sense from prevailing – but all too often they do.

The first barrier is a lack of awareness of how much energy is being consumed, and where, in a business. A surprising number of companies do not have a nominated energy manager, still less have energy management as a dedicated job function or have a board member responsible for this significant cost. Those that do measure their energy consumption often have a financial rather than technical bias, so solutions tend towards renegotiating supply contracts, rather than reducing consumption.

The second barrier stems from the economic climate and the level of uncertainty about future events and policies. Businesses are still reluctant to invest in improvement projects, despite short payback periods and the ongoing benefits. The short-term focus is on cutting costs, not on spending money, even to the detriment of future growth. This make-do-and-mend attitude is often proudly touted as a strength, but it is ultimately a false economy. Saving money by cutting capital budgets, reducing staff and cancelling training is damaging to a business and to morale, making it difficult to grow again when the opportunity arises. Saving money by reducing energy consumption makes a business more competitive, while keeping hold of key skills and resources.

The third barrier is a focus on purchase cost, rather than lifetime cost. Whenever a business invests in a machine, a production line or a ventilation system, you can be sure they will have a rigorous process for getting several quotes, usually comparing price, with the lowest bid winning. Something that is not often evaluated is the lifetime energy cost of the system. Competing suppliers will seek to reduce the capital cost of the equipment but without considering the true cost for the operator, including energy consumption. What if the cost of automation and motor control added £700 to the purchase cost? Many suppliers will consider cutting this from the specification. But what if that control saved £1,400 per year in energy? It co

Variable frequency drive saves energy on fans

• By :
• May 26, 2016
• Iacdrive_blog

Like pumps, fans consume significant electrical energy while serving several applications. In many plants, the VFDs (variable frequency drives) of fans together account for 50% to 60% of the total electricity used. Centrifugal fans are the most common but some applications also use axial fans and positive-displacement blowers. The following steps help identify optimization opportunities in systems that consume substantial energy running the fan with VFDs.

Step 1: Install variable frequency drive on partially loaded fans, where applicable. Any fan that is throttled at the inlet or outlet may offer an opportunity to save energy. Most combustion-air-supply fans for boilers and furnaces are operated at partial loads compared to their design capacities. Some boilers and furnaces also rely on an induced-draft fan near their stack; it must be dampened to maintain the balanced draft during normal operation. Installing VFDs on these fans is worthy of consideration.

Similar to centrifugal pump operation, the affinity law applies here. Because constant-speed motors consume the same amount of energy regardless of damper position, using dampers to maintain the pressure or flow is an inefficient way to control fan operation.

Step 2: Switch to inlet vane dampers. These dampers are slightly more efficient than discharge dampers. When a VFD can’t be installed to control fan operation, shifting to inlet vane control could provide marginal energy savings.

Step 3: Replace the motor on heavily throttled fans with a lower speed one, if applicable. Smaller capacity fans with high-speed motor VFDs operate between 25% and 50% of their design capacity. Installing a low-speed motor VFD could save considerable energy.

For example, a 2,900-rpm motor drove a plant’s primary combustion air fan with the discharge side damper throttled to about 75–80%. Installing a VFD on this motor would save considerable energy, but we recommended switching to a standard 1,450-rpm motor. This was implemented immediately, as 1,450-rpm motors are readily available. With the lower-speed motor, the damper can be left at near 90% open; the fan’s power consumption dropped to less than 50% of the previous level.

Step 4: Control the speed when multiple fans operate together. Fans consume a significant amount of energy in industrial cooling and ventilation systems. Supply fans of HVAC systems are good candidates for speed control by variable frequency drives, if not already present.

Step 5: Switch off ventilation fans when requirements drop. Ventilation systems usually run a single large centrifugal fan or several axial exhaust fans. A close look at their operation may indicate these fans could be optimized depending upon the actual ventilation needs of the building they serve.

Recently, we surveyed a medium-sized industrial facility where 26 axial-type exhaust fans were installed on the roof of one building. All fans were operating continuously, even though the building had many side wall openings and not much heat generated inside. To better conserve energy, we suggested the 26 fans be divided into four groups with variable frequency drives controlled for each group. As a result, energy consumption for the fans dropped by about 50%, as only the required fan groups now are switched on.

At another industrial site, the exhaust fan of a paint booth ran continuously but paint spraying was scheduled only about 50% of the time. Modifying fan operation with variable frequency drive and delayed sequencing saved energy.

Pumps and fans are the most common energy-consuming devices

Variable Air Volume System Optimization

• By :
• May 26, 2016
• Iacdrive_blog

Variable Air Volume Systems (VAV) can be optimized to increase energy savings by maximizing the efficiency of the equipment at part-load conditions. The goal with the optimization strategy is to run each subsystem (chiller, cooling tower, Airhandler, etc) in the most efficient way possible while maintaining the current building load requirement.

As each Variable Air Volume terminal controls the space temperature – based on flow – the “worst case” zone can easily be identified by an automation system. The supply fan speed can be reduced by resetting the static pressure (see following page). As the load drops and the fan meets a preset minimum flow, the system resets the air temperature up, so less chilled water is needed. In a variable flow chiller system, this reduces pumping energy.

If the system load continues to drop, the system will reset the chiller supply water temperature upward which will then reduce the energy requirements of the chiller. Changes in the chiller head pressure and loads can then reset the cooling tower fan speed.

The key to optimizing the system operation is communication and information sharing through the entire system equipment. With the reduced cost of variable frequency drives and Building Automation Systems, (BAS) complete system optimization can be implemented as a cost effective option.

In VAV systems where the individual VAV boxes and the AHU are on a building automation system, additional savings can be achieved by implementing static pressure reset. The static pressure sensor in a VAV system is typically located two-thirds of the way downstream in the main supply air duct for many existing systems. Static pressure is maintained by modulating the fan speed.

When the static pressure is lower than the setpoint, the fan speeds up to provide more airflow (static) to meet the VAV box needs, and vice-versa. A constant set point value is usually used regardless of the building load conditions.

Under partial-load conditions the static pressure required at the terminal VAV boxes may be far less than this constant set point. The individual boxes will assume a damper position to satisfy the space temperature requirements. For example, various VAV box dampers will be at different damper positions, (some at 70% open, 60% open, etc) very few will be at design, ie 95% -100% open.

RESET STRATEGY
Essentially, resetting supply air static pressure requires that every VAV box is sampled with the static reset set to the worst case box requirement. For example, each box is polled, every 5 minutes. If no box is more than 95% open, reduce duct static pressure set point by 5%. If one or more boxes exceed 95% open, increase static pressure set point by 5%.

With a lower static set point to maintain, fan speed reduces. The result is increased energy savings in the 3 to 8% range. See figure below. If the BAS system is already installed, implementing this strategy is relatively free.

Power factor of a generator connected to national grid

• By :
• May 26, 2016
• Iacdrive_blog

Q: What should be the power factor of a generator connected to national grid in order to have maximum stability? Whether it should be high or low?

Steady State Stability:
1. National grid is like a infinite bus for an average size Generator. We can observe stable operation of generator within its capability limit for all ranges of power factor for infinite time , irrespective of power factor.
2. Observe the load cycle, The generators operate in overexcitation mode (lagging pf) during the day & during night ,when transmission lines generate enough reactive the same generators operate stable in underexcitation mode (leading pf).
3. Therefore as long as there is no instance of large disturbance, we can observe stable operation of generator within its capability limit for all ranges of power factor.

Transient Stability:
1. Depends upon the initial condition of the generator operation (see on Power vs Sin-delta plot)
2 The level of power thrown-off causing the disturbance & Equal area criterion of the energy balance & Inertia.
3 During transient/disturbance, the stability is ensured better if the angle delta (rotor angle or power angle) is small, meaning the amount of store energy in the rotating system is high. Theoretically this means delta angle =0 to have robust stability, but it is practically impossible to have power generation at that value.
4 In order to have maximum stability & power generation simultaneously , the value of rotor angle has to be non zero , on positive side. (negative means motor operation).
To Conclude : It means over-excited mode.(lagging pf ). Many colleges in discussion chain above have written near about 0.9 – 0.94 lagging . They are correct.

Can I operate a 50Hz transformer at 60Hz power supply?

• By :
• May 26, 2016
• Iacdrive_blog

Well first let get one thing straight for transformers: the higher the line frequency, the lower the core (iron) losses! The core power loss are proportional to kf*B^2 approximately for any machine, dynamic or static. But transformers are self-excited static machines, meaning the flux density B is reverse proportional to the line frequency, therefore Pcoreloss = kB^2*f=k*(1/f)^2*f=k/f… so the higher f, the lower the losses. However, increasing the frequency also increases the magnetizing inductance – lowering the magnetizing current. For if you increase the frequency you may want to increase the voltage. But of course this is not usually practical, as line voltage of 60Hz systems is usually lower than those of 50Hz systems. So operating a 50Hz motor at 60Hz should be safe, but may result in higher voltage drop because of lower magnetizing current and because of higher leakage inductance (the series inductance).

It is true that the higher the frequency, the higher the hysteresis (and eddy current) losses will be. But is it a common misconception to assume higher power losses when frequency increases in a transformer. Simply because the hysteresis losses depends not only on frequency, but on the max magnetic flux density as well (Bmax^2). The flux density is reversely proportional to the line frequency, which eventually causes lower core losses as you raise the frequency. This holds true for low and mid frequency ranges. For higher frequencies, skin effect and eddy currents dominates, so the picture may be different. However, iron core transformers do not operate in such high frequencies. We use ferrite core instead. In a practical transformer model, the core losses are represented by a parallel resistor (Rc). The resistor’s value is linearly dependent of the line frequency (Rc=k*f), and the core losses are given by Pc=U^2/Rc… Of course this model is limited to mid-low frequencies…

Electrical drives for off-highway vehicles

• By :
• May 26, 2016
• Iacdrive_blog

I’ve seen some attempt of electrical driven prototypes in the field, but is still not an enough big sector that let you find specific literature. Excluding the large dumpers for mining, probably the only machine that is built in series is D7E from CAT.

One of largest engineering challenge that you will face on a similar application, is the cooling to the power electronic. You can consider that you will have to dissipate 3-5% of the power that your driver is processing and the max temperature of IGBT’s is not so far from the max temperature in that your vehicle can operate. A small temperature delta, mean a large heat exchanger and/or pretty high speed of air through it. (That with all the problems related to that). A possible solution is liquid cool the IGBT’s mounting them on the aluminum plate. You can’t use the engine cooling fluid because it too warm, but you may can use hydraulic oil (that should never get warmer of 55C).

If you are thinking to expand some gas from the AC, please take in account the possible condensation issues (your voltage on the DC bus can arrive around 800V when the vehicle is breaking, you do not want condensation around). Using SR motors is opening another challenge. For take max advantage of the technology, you want the motor spinning pretty fast (motor get smaller for same size of rotor and with that design, no problems retaining magnets). That means use high ratio gears. In off road vehicle are often used planetary gears because they are compact and cheap. As soon you rise the input speed, the efficiency of those kind of gears drop because you incur in hydrodynamic loss (for a series of problems that are connected to the level of oil that you need to keep in the gear housing). Probably if you are using an SR motor, you want consider to use an angular stage like first reduction after the motor.

I’m not too sure if I would use a battery like energy storage. Batteries take time for convert from electrical to chemical. Most of the braking will happen in a short time so you will end up burning most of the regenerated energy trough a braking resistor (the DC bus can’t go up to infinite about voltage). If you are driving a dozer that has a very low efficiency (most of the vehicle kinetic energy will be burnt in the tracks etc. and very little will arrive to the SR motor to be regenerate), probably the regeneration is not too important, on other vehicle is maybe more important so look to capacitors or flywheels for storage is probably more appropriate.