Iacdrive|Automation Solution

Variable frequency drive Constant Torque/Variable Torque

A typical variable torque application would be a centrifugal pump. A typical constant torque application would be a conveyor, and there are positive displacement pumps that are also constant torque. Have a talk with a mechanical engineer, get them to show you curves and explain.

DBR stands for Dynamic braking resistor. Regeneration will happen when the motor rotates a speed higher than the speed which corresponds to the frequency setpoint ie.. the rotor speed is more than the speed of the rotating magnetic field.
Regeneration feeds back energy to the drive which results in DC bus overvoltage. To prevent the drive from tripping due to DC bus overvoltage the DBRs are used. The regenerative energy is discharged in the resistor as heat.

Regenerative Breaking – we used to have VFD on a vehicle rolling road. So when the car is travelling faster than the VFD, the VFD generate back into the power supply – causing a break effect. If you had a large mass- large inertia that you want to stop quickly, you need to break the load- you can do that with regenerative breaking. Otherwise, disconnecting the variable frequency drive, will mean your load just freely rotates, and that can mean it will take 30 minute to come to a stop for a large inertia.

Active Front end- I first came across this term with ABB. It is all to do with how to mitigate harmonics from VFDs. You can use phase shift transformers, but with modern electronics, you can use a opposite phase current to counter act the harmonics generated from the VFD. So the overall impact on the network is small.
In active front end technology the rectifier is basically an inverter with IGBTs.
The main advantage are:
1) Low current THD <5 %
2) It is basically a four quadrant rectifier .Referring my last post please note that you will not require a DBR with AFE. The increase in voltage of DC Bus due to regeneration can be fed back to the input AC supply in the form of energy. So you don’t require a DBR.
3) AFE drives have very good immunity to input voltage fluctuations.

Just an advice. Please go through variable frequency drive literatures (available in plenty) to have a good understanding of the different VFD technologies.
Selection of VFD requires proper understanding of the VFDs and the overall electrical system. There are lots of marketing gimmicks in the world of VFD. Always be careful before selecting a VFD specially higher KW drives.

For large drives, you need to speak with supplier to configure your machine correctly. There are many options, but yes active front ends are available. But there are other solutions; ASI Robicon use a current driven VFD, so harmonics are lessened in the first place, so an active front end is not the right terminology. It is a different solution. I used a 10MW version of that type of ac drive. I think Siemens have bought the company since.

VFD PWM and PAM definition

PWM is shorted for Pulse Width Modulation, it’s a variable frequency drive (VFD) regulate way to change the pulse width according to certain rules to adjust the output volume and waveform.

PAM is shorted for Pulse Amplitude Modulation, it’s to change the pulse amplitude according to certain rules pulse amplitude pulse train to adjust the variable frequency drive output volume and waveform.

Change transformer vector group

Transformer nameplate vector group is YNd1. However, the nature of connection on both its primary and secondary side is such that:
Generator phase A = Transformer phase c
Generator phase B = Transformer phase b
Generator phase C = Transformer phase a

Also, on transformer HV (secondary connected to grid),
Transformer phase A = Grid phase C
Transformer phase B = Grid phase B
Transformer phase C = Grid phase A

The questions are:

1. How does this affect the vector group (YNd1) of the transformer? Will it be changed to YNd11?
2. Will it make any difference as far as the vector group is concerned if instead of phase A and C, phase B and C were swapped on both ends of the transformer?
3. The transformer protection relay is configured for YNd1 group, and it is reading negative phase sequence current (ACB instead of ABC). Changing the vector group configuration will solve the problem?
4. Relay is used for differential protection (percentage differential) of the transformer.
Will this negative phase sequence affect normal operation of the transformer in any way?

1. How does this affect the vector group (YNd1) of the transformer? Will it be changed to YNd11?

Yes, the name plate vector group of a transformer is only valid for a standard phase rotation ABC. for a phase rotation ACB the apparent vector group will be YNd11.

2. Will it make any difference as far as the vector group is concerned if instead of phase A and C, phase B and C were swapped on both ends of the transformer?

No, by swapping any two phases the rotation becomes no standard and the apparent vector group will become YNd1

3. The transformer protection relay is configured for YNd1 group, and it is reading negative phase sequence current (ACB instead of ABC). Changing the vector group configuration will solve the problem?

I think the way the relay is configured at the moment will give you problems, if I’m correct you should be able to see differential current when the transformer is loaded, and it is likely to trip on the first through fault (can you confirm this). To resolve this issue you have two options.
i) Set the vector group to YNd11 in the relay, this will remove the differential current but will mean the relays see’s 100% NPS current and 0% PPS current, this may give you problem if you have any NPS elements enabled in the relay ( inter turn fault detection, directional elements etc)
ii)Set the vector group to YNd1 and the phase rotation setting to non standard ACB this will get rid of the NPS currents and the differential current, so this is probably the best solution.

4. Relay is used for differential protection (percentage differential) of the transformer.
Will this negative phase sequence affect normal operation of the transformer in any way?

No, there will be no problem with the transformer itself just the relay protecting it.

As i said previously if I’m understanding the problem correctly, you should be able to see differential current at the moment when the transformer is loaded, is this correct?

Why industrial induction motor star point not grounded?

In any electrical system, we limit the neutral grounding to 1 or 2 locations at the power source, eg, the star-points of generators or transformers. By keeping the grounded neutrals at the power source, earth leakage current will be flowing radially from the power source to the point of short-circuit at downstream. In this way the direction of earth fault current flow can be easily identified and the earth fault protection relays in the distribution system can easily be coordinated.

Grounding a motor star point will create an earth path for earth leakage current to flow through that motor’s star point. If there are 10 motors in a process plant and their star points are all grounded, there are 10 additional paths for earth leakage currents to flow through.
If all the motors’ star points are grounded in this way the earth fault current detections by the protection relays will be complicated and likely they will trip at the incorrect locations because earth fault currents are flowing in many directions toward multiple grounded neutral points.

Therefore the electrical consumers (ie the load, including the capacitor banks), even if they are star connected, are not to be grounded.

Grounding of neutral point is not being decided base on the presence of unbalance loads. It is decided for safety reason and for earth fault protection requirement. Unbalance 3-phase load will result in some current flowing through the neutral conductor but it doesn’t result in a (residual) current flowing through the neutral-ground connection.

Motor is a balanced 3-phase load, this I agree. However when the system supply voltage is unbalanced caused by unbalanced loads somewhere else or due to network conductors problem, the motor operating under unbalance voltage will result in unbalance current in the 3 windings. The same is true for the generator windings under that condition. The design engineer may then decide that individual machines should be fixed with negative phase sequence current protection.

Even if there is a neutral voltage shift in the induction motor, we should not ground the motor’s neutral point. If you ground it, it may create nuisance trip of earth fault protection relays (the motor’s EF relay, upstream EF relays, or the EF relay connected to transformer’s neutral-ground CT).

I am sure in reality, there is some neutral voltage shift in motor’s star point. However, there is no harm with that.

If you ground the star point, you still will not get rid of the unbalance current/voltage from the motor windings. There the negative sequence current is still present in the motor winding.
If you think an unbalance voltage supply is causing problem to the motors, you should solve the unbalance voltage problem elsewhere, not by grounding the motor’s star point.

Circulating current in parallel transformers

When two transformers are in a parallel group, a transformer with a higher tap position will typically have a higher (LV side) no-load voltage than the other one with a lower tap position. These unequal no-load voltages (unequal tap positions) will cause a circulating current to flow through the parallel connected transformers. A transformer with higher no-load voltage (typically higher tap position) will produce circulating current, while a transformer with lower no-load voltage (typically lower tap position) will receive circulating current.

When load is connected on these two parallel transformers, the circulating current will remain the same, but now it will be superimposed on the load current in each transformer, i.e. for a transformer producing circulating current, this will be added to its load current, and for a transformer receiving circulating current, this will be subtracted from its load current.

Thus voltage control of parallel transformers with the circulating current method aims to minimize the circulating current while keeping the voltage at the target value.

In case of a parallel operation of transformers, the electric current carried by these transformers are inversely proportional to their internal impedance. Think of it as two parallel impedances in a simple circuit behind a voltage source, you will have equal currents through each impedance only if you have two identical impedances, in some cases as stated above, tapping could be a problem, the other one is the actual manufacturing tolerances which could diverge by almost 5-10%, if the transformers are manufactured by different suppliers or not within the same batch. So, the difference in current between the currents through these two impedances is basically the circulating current as it is not seen outside these parallel impedances.

The currents that are produces due to magnetic flux circulation in the core are called eddy currents and these eddy currents are responsible for core losses in transformer.
While the circulating currents are the zero sequence currents that may be produces due to following causes.
1- when there is three phase transformer the (3rd, 5th, 7th….) harmonic currents which are called zero sequence currents from all the three winding of three phase transformer add up and become considerable even in loaded conditions these currents have no path in Y/Y connection of transformer so a tertiary winding is provided co conduct these currents but in Y/d or D/y connection these currents circulate in delta winding.
2- Whenever there is unbalanced loading in transformer. In which with positive sequence, negative sequence and zero sequence currents are also produced which cause circulating currents.
3- When the transformer banks are used and the transformers have phase between them then circulating currents are produced between them, than transformers in the bank get loaded without being shearing the power to the load.

Circuit Breakers tests

1- For small circuit breakers we can do the test of Magnetic protection behavior by using “Injection Current Apparatus”, and suppose the CB’s results were good, do you think it’s enough? I’m sure not, because by this apparatus we can inject the necessary current with a very low voltage value (5-15V), so, do you think that the arc will be the same if we have the same current but with “400V”?

2- The same question for “Short Circuit Tests”

Personally, I done the tests of many MCBs for different manufactures by using “Injection Current Apparatus”, and I saw the same tests in laboratory in France for the same MCBs by injection the same currents values with 230V or 400V depending on the CB, be sure, the results weren’t the same, we found some differences for Magnetic protection tests, and big differences for Short Circuit tests.

Difference between ICCB, MCCB and MCB

The aforementioned types of Circuit Breakers are used in LV System and generally based on the same operating principle.
MCB and MCCB/ICCB have a bimetal heater for overload which releases the Contact s while for short circuit the trip / electromagnet hammers itself against moving contacts. The arc created by breaking contacts is extinguished in an arc chamber. Are defined as “Thermo-magnetic “ CBs , accordingly. It is operating characteristic addressing the overload by thermal action of the bimetal strip and instantaneously dealing with short circuit occurrences by electromagnetic action.

MCB – Miniature Circuit Breaker is suitable for domestic usage. Used to protect final circuits from O/C such as Overload & Short Circuit.
i- MCB is basically made in accordance to BS 3871, is now superseded by BS EN 60898 which recognizes type B, C & D.
Type B is suitable in domestic premises.
Type C is used in commercial & industrial applications.
Type D is suitable for application where a high in-rush current is expected.
ii- MCB is of low breaking / making capacity as well as low current rating compared with MCCB/ICCB. MCBs available in different number of poles (SP, DP, TP,,).

MCCB – Molded Case Circuit Breaker & Insulated Case Circuit breaker are also current limiting devices but with high making/ breaking capacity and current ratings compared with MCB. MCCB and ICCB are almost the same and both are manufactured in accordance to NEMA AB1/AB3 to suit industrial and commercial purposes.
The advent of electronic protection increased the use of them and the scope is widened like tolerances, range of time & current adjustment. By virtue of that a good discrimination can be achieved with accuracy about ±10%.
Eventually, MCCB/ICCB has advantages in the capability of accommodating further features which can be provided as
i. RCD.
ii. Under voltage device.
iii. A shunt trip coils that enabling remote tripping.
iv. Auxiliary switches for remote monitoring and/or control.

Why transformer rating is shown in KVA?

Transformers are rated in {VA, kVA, MVA etc.} due to flows of active and reactive power through transformer. In case of transformer we have active power losses as consequence of existence inside resistance of windings (primary and secondary) and existence of active losses of ferromagnetic core and other side we have reactive power losses as consequence of existence losses of magnetic flux (primary and secondary) and existence of reactive power losses of ferromagnetic core.

[VA]=sqrt(sqr[W]+sqr[VAr])

Transformer is rated in kVA by the manufacturer to inform users about the maximum power (voltage and current) that support it, the reason for not rating it in KW is that the active power (kW) is depend on the loads (lighting, machines..)

The simple answer is: It is because the kVA (or MVA) rating is only rating that matters to express a transformer’s “capacity” to allow the “passage” of power. That capacity is the thermal capacity dictated by the current it can carry at a given ambient temperature, regardless of the power factor. So combined with its voltage ratings, kVA (or MVA) is the value that matters. kW rating does not matter as transformer can handle unity power factor or in other words, a transformer can handle kW equal to its kVA rating at any time.

Remember that a transformer, as the name suggests, is only a transformation device or a pass through device and not a power producing device like a generator or an UPS, where their capacity to produce real power (kW) is an independent limit from the thermal ( kVA) limit.

To take it a step further, if you have an ability to cool the transformer further, you can augment the kVA (or MVA) rating of a transformer. This would explain having multiple kVA/ MVA ratings on transformers with forced cooling aids installed on them.

If you think of it, this is not different from a cable or a conductor’s capacity expression. Except that a transformer can have more than one voltage levels and different ampacities on primary and secondary, but the kVA rating remains the same on either side. So that makes kVA a more convenient way to express its thermal capacity vs. the amperes alone.

Transformer Magnetic Design

Control Servo motor with a variable frequency drive

Looking at those AC drives they recommend an Induction motor. A servo motor with permanent magnets which is not quite an induction motor. So, if a servo with permanent magnets can be used instead an induction with these kinds of AC drives.

Actually, the term “Servo” makes a reference about “feedback”, it means, whether we need a control loop, we are talking in terms about Servo, in this case, we have, or we know, the “feedback” by an encoder. Typical variable frequency drive doesn’t have a input for an encoder, so, if you want to control a Servo Motor with a VFD, you can move the motor, but you can’t control it.

A servo motor can be an induction servo, a brushless servo, a reluctance servo a dc servo – each of these can be either linear or rotary and can come with a variety of feedback such as tachometer, resolver of various pole counts, incremental or absolute encoders discreet or serial interface with different bus options, laser feedback, halls etc.

Then you come to the term variable frequency drive. Brushless servo amplifiers are also vfds. Do standard inverters have proper control of induction, and brushless motors. Some allow for a software switch, some allow for a firmware download, some don’t. Will inverters accept feedback – some have it built in, most that allow it do so by option cards, many do not.

Normal input in a variable frequency drive is, digital to start or stop, and we could have an analogic input to control by potentiometer.

Using AC Drives for the servo application is quite possible, provided the application is less demanding in critical positioning purpose.
There are number of makes that showcases pinpoint positioning of motor shaft being driven by AC Drives like Hitachi SJ700 / Emerson Uni drive SP / Danfoss FC etc.

Its beneficial to opt for the AC Drives as it supports SLVC [ VFD gives almost servo-like torque at low rpms if you give it encoder feedback ], multiple motors can be accessed, torque requirement can be met if required, power dips can be sustained using VFD’s.