Category: Iacdrive_blog

Home  ›  Iacdrive_blog  ›  Page 26

Calculate Capacitors Power

In general, to calculate the necessary Power of Capacitors, we can use the following formula:

Qc = P ( tgφ1 – tgφ2 )

where :
– Qc : the Power of Capacitors.
– P : the total Power of Loads that are running during normal working.
– tgφ1 : the tangent of φ1 ( the angel between current & voltage before compensation )
– tgφ2 : the tangent of φ2 ( the angel between current & voltage after compensation )

In all cases, we should take into consideration the following points :
1- It will be better to oversize the calculated Qc by ” 10 to 15% “.

2- Be careful when compensate the PF of a Motor to avoid the Over-excitation case, but we can verify it by using the following formula : Qc (motor) = 2 x P (1 – Cos φ ), where :
– P : the Motor’s Power.
– Cos φ : the PF of the motor before compensation.

3- After calculation of Qc, the choosing of Capacitors type will be done according to the Harmonic Distortion percentage. Noting that in some case where the Harmonic Distortion percentage is high, we should use ” Detuned Reactors ” with Capacitors, and when this percentage is too high, we can’t install the Capacitors before minimizing or eliminating the harmonics that their percentages are too high.

Resistance to ground

Resistance to ground is greatly influenced by the ambient conditions and the state of the motor when tested.

Factors Affecting Insulation Measurement:
First, it is important to understand that we are measuring a motor circuit. We are connecting our test instrument at a point where we can measure the majority of the de-energized circuit. As such, we do not necessarily know where an insulation anomaly is located when identified. We also have the motor circuit potentially exposed to differing environments. Ambient temperature and humidity can have a significant effect on any insulation measurements. When a motor circuit’s insulation is tested is also a major variable. Testing a motor circuit immediately after shut down will most likely yield good results. This is because the motor is warm and dry. Testing a motor after it has been shut down for a while may indicate insulation problems, but if the motor is allowed to reach ambient temperature, the insulation integrity may appear normal. This is because while cooling, particularly in somewhat humid conditions, moisture (condensation) will accumulate within the motor and lessen ground resistance. Is this a problem? Yes, particularly if starting from a partially cooled state. Most motor failures occur during starting. This is when the insulation is exposed to the most stresses. If your motors are only down for a few hours at a time, then this is when insulation testing should be conducted.

When conducting insulation testing, the most important consideration is consistency. Always test at the same location, use the same test voltage, perform the test for the same amount of time, and use the same test instrument. It is also important to note the motor temperature, ambient temperature, and relative humidity. It is also helpful to compare like motors and the motors that are operating within the same environment.

Insulation testing is somewhat ambiguous. Although there are reference standards, they cannot be rigidly followed because they do not factor in all of the potential variables that may be encountered. Temperature is the biggest variable. Temperature of the motor and the ambient temperature are of primary concern. One method to help negate the influence of temperature is performance of a “Timed Resistance Test.” This testing is comprised of “Dielectric Absorption,” “Polarization Index,” and “Step Voltage” testing. Dielectric Absorption is a 1 minute test. The resultant values at 30 seconds and 1 minute are logged and the ratio of the 30 second value divided into the 1 minute value, is a relative indicator of insulation integrity. A polarization index is a 10 minute test with the resultant ratio derived from the 1 minute value divided into the 10 minute value.

So, if ground resistance is low after prolonged shutdown and it is at ambient conditions, then you probably have an insulation issue. Conditioning of the insulation may be required. A motor shop can perform a “Clean, Dip and Bake.” process which will prolong the motor longevity. If the motor is several years old you may want to HiPot the insulation but if you are not using one of the newer units that automatically shut down upon a jump in current, you may cause insulation failure and that would necessitate a rewind.

Generator reactive power

After the generator connected to grid, the generator will be more stable than before connected to grid, because in this situation the frequency and voltage are fixed and controlled by the grid, not the independent generators. How much active and reactive power you can contribute to the grid depends on the grid requirement, such as when the grid shorts of active power, the frequency of the grid will drop, and then the grid will ask you or other generators to contribute more active power, and if short of reactive power, voltage will drop, then you could be asked to contribute more reactive power, and vice versa, which depend on the balance of power which is generated from generators and consumed by the users.

From generator side, the less reactive power, the better, as this power increase the VA and then the current to increase the losses on the transmission line which will be carried by the plant. But from grid side, as not too many equipment can generate the reactive power, the more contribution of the reactive power, the better.

At the full load operation of generator, the maximum contribution of reactive power should depend on the PF of the generator at full load (manufacturer provided for each generator). If your PF is too low and it could affect your active power transfers to the grid and will be punished by the grid. At the not full load situation of the generator, the PF could not be decided by the generator, if the grid does not need too much active power from you, but needs more reactive power and asks you to contribute more, PF could be more than 1 at the moment, but never over the Max reactive power calculated from full load.

Solar power

On a purely theoretical level and ignoring interrelated economics and energy usage, it makes sense to charge EVs during the day – though never in non-distributed environments, IMO.

In reality, and the reality for likely the rest of my life, it makes more economic and particulate emissions sense to distribute solar power during the day to decrease, and ultimately decommission, fossil fuel sources used for peak demand supply that occurs during the day.

Thus, using solar output distributed to offset the dirtiest, most expensive and most distribution grid loading power enhances and optimizes the value and worth of that solar generated power – both economically and ecologically. Attempting, therefore, to do all of ones’ EV charging off peak is the optimal solution until the mix of energy sources changes dramatically – likely a 20 plus year process even in the most environmentally friendly “energy generation mix” regions of the world. Even if one charges during “peak”, it is better to simply charge from the grid as the distributed energy is allowed to go to areas of peak demand. Again, for at least my lifetime, I don’t project a more optimal use of that generation even assuming the archaic state of most “grids” persist.

Right now, even for a 1 story commercial building, solar cannot supply the energy needs used in the office, much less a manufacturing facility. In fact, it can normally only supply 1/3 or less for the most energy and resource intensive commercial environment in a UV intense region (and that is quite an optimistic calculation, more likely 1/5th). Once you get to two or more stories on the building, one is not even close. On a modest tower with a tower parking garage, the footprint is likely to small to even generate the needs on a theoretical basis. Distributing the energy to location of greatest needs will allow us to dial down and decommission peak sources, which again are the dirtiest and most wasteful.

At some point, we will hit a new equilibrium where the energy generation mix is much cleaner, solar generation specifically is much more efficient, and peak power generation is handled more efficiently and ecologically cleaner. I still believe, however, that distributed power is better than “off grid” type of scenarios as it allows the energy to go where it is being demanded at the moment, decreasing the need for redundant sourcing. And, even in the cleanest energy generation mix, redundancy means building more of something and is by definition more energy wasteful and ecologically wasteful than a scenario where the redundancy buffer that is required is lesser.

Much of this type of debate reminds me of the consumer sort recycle versus the destination sort recycle debate. Even with the advances in trash collection and recycling processes, 20 years later we are suboptimizing the recycling process. Much of the reason for that is the “style” statement, making people feel like they are contributing by sorting themselves. It may make some people “feel” better by imagining “independent” off grid or semi off grid solutions. In reality, however, we live in an interconnected world where “sharing” or distributing solutions to leverage scale and minimize redundancies is far more advantageous, economic, and a faster route to a solution to both particulate emissions issues and energy independence for groups of people.

Cleaning solvent for motor windings

Usually, the dry ice approach is the best bet because it leaves no real residue from the cleaning material. If the insulation is “fluffing”, the likely problem is that the air pressure used to move the dry ice particles is too high.

A second alternative that can be used is “corn cob blasting”. The media is reusable, biodegradable particles of corn husks. Again, a relatively low pressure air stream is required. It WILL damage the insulation if the pressure is too high, just as in the dry ice case.

Most solvents will aggressively attack the insulation systems used for windings: this is specifically true for the larger machines where mica tapes are coated / filled with a resinous material (vacuum pressure impregnation). However, it is equally true for smaller machines where the primary insulation is at the strand level and is essentially a varnish or enamel coating on the wire. If you’re worried about how the solvent will affect the insulation system, get in touch with the motor supplier for their suggested approach.

If a solvent-based cleaner must be used, it should be applied sparingly – BY HAND – on the areas to be cleaned to break up the oily / greasy contaminant and then rewashed with some other (non-solvent) approach to clean away any solvent residue. This also will require a “dry out” of the equipment after the second washing. This three-stage approach tends to minimize damage done by solvent that may be left behind to “eat away” at the varnishes, enamels, and resins comprising the insulation system.

One last thing – pretty much ALL solvents are going to be designated as hazardous materials in most regions, due to health concerns. Therefore it is more a case of “pick your poison”!

Negative Impact of Accelerated Depreciation on the Indian Economy

For argument sake or as an illustration, if we assume that 1 MW solar will generate 1.6 Mkwh and rs. 1.2/kwh is rebate for AD taken by the investor = 16 x 1.2 = Rs. 19.2 lakhs/year

[Now, Adani and Tata Power have been negotiating the firm Contract PPA to get more, like wise biomass people who based their PPA on LCOE, but, are asking more money from Government, hence, Solar PV developers may also follow the same route after few years, wherein this rebate of AD given will not have any meaning!!]

Total rebate given = 19.2/year x 25 years = Rs. 480 lakhs = Rs. 4.8 Crore (that too year wise depreciated / devaluated rupee value, which has no meaning !)

But, the tax saved is = 80% of investment = 0.8 x 10 cr = 8 Crore, upfront, right in the first year, which is great value, which government would have used as Equity to develop many more MWs.

Is this POLICY of providing 80% Accelerated Depreciation correct by any standards and why Finance Secretaries or policy makers can’t take note and issue corrective measure for INDIA FIRST Culture??

MNRE, in its Draft policy has proposed 20 to 40% Viability Gap Funding, which will further worsen the LOSS to the government !!

If Mahagenco (with 50% subsidy) goes ahead with the proposed business model, then, how and why State and hence Central government has to take the burden due to such errant policies??
We must put an end to the Scrupulous Project Development, which avails the Capital Subsidy (or Viability Gap Funding) and the Accelerated Depreciation and then the Promoters Sell the Project to a prospective buyer, who in turn approaches the Government for the Tariff hike in the 25 years tenure (please note the Politics dynamics or change of administrative set up will hamper the sustainability), thus, the nation is a great loser

Policies and the enabling tax advantages to few promoters (who claimed Capital Subsidy without creating good quality asset or with NON functional biomass power plants) have made a big dent on Indian Economy without any good results esp in Renewable energy sector.

Government or its administration through such policy (without checks or being accountable) transferred the Public Property to the Private Companies in the Form of Renewable Energy Generation through Capital Subsidy (or Viability Gap Funding) coupled with Accelerated Depreciation along with Low cost Debt fund to these Corporate companies (like EXIM etc) / Project Developers – entrepreneurs, which are not paid back as few of these projects are not functioning and still no action taken to recover the Capital Subsidy paid or Tax recovery which was availed through Accelerated Depreciation (AD).

If Government would have established all these projects from the Tax collections (which are doled out as free through AD), it would have needed only a fraction i.e only Rs. 51,504 Crores, which could have been managed from the taxes of Rs.137,344 Crores while retaining the land and property in Government’s name and could have generated lot of employment.

But, by giving an opportunity to Private sector, many have failed to deliver and no Action to recover the Capital Subsidy or the Debt (due to Tribunals etc…. Please be informed that Indian Parliament had to pass an act in Dec 2012 to recover debt (through wrong business cases of Project Promoters, approved by many banks which were certified by National and International Advisors or Consultants) which is around a whopping 40 Billion USD!!)

Total estimated Renewable energy project capacity = 12% of total installed 220GW = 26000 MW
Cost/ MW Investment Equity Debt Cap Sub AD
Source MW installed Total 30% 70% Rs(Cr) 80%adj
Biomass 6 4,500 27,000 8,100 18,900 6,750 21,600

Wind 7 20,160 131,040 39,312 91,728 104,832

Solar PV 10 1,300 13,000 3,900 9,100 VGF? 10,400
(Ground)

India renewable energy

Refer to the REI seminar, wherein Government of India representative stated that the VGF payment is spread over 5 year period.

1) Any profit Making Company, must have had the benefits from the Government (subsidies etc) / Eco system.

The profit must be taxed for the improvement of the Economy of the Country.

2) Present renewable energy policy is allowing these profit making companies to avoid paying taxes, and own the assets due to such FREE EQUITY, which belongs to the Government, thus Accelerated Depreciation (AD) is a killer of Economy.

Thus, we are unable to develop the NICHE technology as unrelated industries are owning the project due to avoidance of paying taxes and just to own the assets due to such loop hole in the policy, later making an early exit to make quick money without serving the Nation.

AD promotion is not a level playing field apart from Tax loss to the Government.

3) The Tax thus saved, is again allowed to earn 19 to 24% Return On Equity (ROE), which is very unfair (actually this should have been disallowed to have rs.3/kwh less tariff), due to a fact that, this is public money, hence, should not be allowed to have such wind fall gains.

4) By loading ROE, showing high CAPEX and taking back more than 30% project equity, getting EXIM Bank or such low cost funding to reduce the interest burden, but, Tariff claimed of rs.18 or 15 or 10/kwh is once again a kind of Tariff subsidy, thus, a common man is paying more money for RE power tariff, which is a great killer of economy and making people poor.

5) Viability Gap funding in addition to AD will be an Economic suicide as a project promoter will be allowed to take back 60 to 70% of project cost without paying tax on profit earned !!

This is likely encourage poor equipment buying / its maintenance due to such immediate undue / windfall gains.

6) Despite taking such huge wind fall gains, again these project promoters will be allowed to sell the project to others, to make further wind fall gain to make few existing companies to get undue benefits due to such wrong policy guidelines, despite many representations made to the Government, which states that they have go clearance from Finance Ministry to further ruin the Economy !!

What is SynRM motor?

Many others thirty years ago, synchronous reluctance motors (SynRM) have finally replacing the traditional AC induction motors in the industry. ABB has claimed achieving IE4 efficiency with SynRM, a great improvement from IE2 efficiency with the traditional induction motors, for the same motor envelope size and input power.

A SynRM is a true AC machine with or without permanent magnets on the rotor. It is totally different from the closed-loop controlled, permanent magnet brushless DC machines (BLDC) in that one would never be able to get rid of torque ripples as that have been achieved in commonly used BLDC machines.

The difference is on the rotor: copper or aluminum bars for inductance motor (squirrel cage after joining end disks) vs. flux barriers (air pockets) in SynRM. The SynRM rotor can be further enhanced by inserting permanent magnets in the air pockets for a machines called PM assisted SynRM. High efficiency is achieved for two reasons: 1) no copper loss due to the lack of rotor bars and end disks; and 2) high inductance difference between d- and q-axes (Ld-Lq) because of flux barriers and motor torque linearly proportional to (Ld-Lq).

In comparison with the traditional AC induction motor, a SynRM motor needs a frequency inverter and when permanent magnets are present in the rotor, a rotor position feedback sensor. The drawbacks of SynRM are the motor torque ripples due to switching operation, inherited small air gap, etc.

Special Protection System Advantages and Disadvantages

Quite a few yrs. ago around 1988, I was a Protection and Control Engineer at a large utility in the SE. We were doing our planning to bring the final unit of a large 4 unit plant on line, when it was discovered that we could encounter some unusual instability scenarios. The funny thing was that with all units on-line and above a certain MW output, all that would need to occur would be opening of a remote 500kV breaker on one of the particular lines and the event could trigger, eventually bringing ALL 4 units at the plant out-of-step and tripping off all of the generation in just a few minutes (3600 MW).

The studies were performed numerous times by internal and external experts but the results were always the same. The key problem seemed to be the existing network configuration of 4 units and only 3 transmission lines. Adding a 4th 500kV line from the plant seemed to cure the problem under all conditions, including close in 3 phase faults with breaker failure. Unfortunately, the cost and timeline to build a new t-line was a real challenge!

In order to proceed with commissioning the 4th unit and remediating any scenarios for tripping all generation, a Special Protection System (SPS) was developed. A transfer trip channel was installed at the remote substation, keying on the breaker contact opening. At the plant, a Unit Trip scheme was installed that had a MW meter supervising tripping of any one unit selected by the plant operator (U1-U2-U3-U4). If all units were on line and generation was above 2500 MW (margin of safety added), then a receipt of remote breaker opening would trip the selected unit to avoid having all units cascade into out-of-step condition.

Advantages: Clearly, this Special Protection System saved the day, and bought time until an additional line was added 4 years later.

Disadvantages: The downside was the challenge of installing and testing such a complicated scheme with the potential for mis-operation. I don’t recall any mis-operations occurring, but it was still a bit “dicey”. I have been at that same plant during a full load unit trip (Generator differential) and it was an “exciting” experience to say the least! While I did recommend that we conduct a “live test” to see what would really happen and perhaps test our system BLACK START procedures, this suggestion was not well received by management (LOL).

This was my only encounter with such a special protection system scheme in my 35 years of utility work, but it was very interesting to be involved with this project.

TIA portal, a nightmare!

I have been using TIA since it was launched and it has come on leaps and bounds since it was first launched. Its a great tool and as already mentioned it has its bad aspects but it also has its good aspects. The biggest improvement (in my opinion) is the drag and drop functionality in the WinCC part and the code editor. Just need a field PG to be launched with screens to fold out so you can have multiple screen!!

They are moving in the right direction and it was always going to be resource hungry WinCC was bad enough for that in previous versions.

New improvements make a long list but one of the most recent is being able to switch a DB to and from optimised. How many times in previous versions did I forget to check the box then have to delete the DB and create it again. PID loop tuning function within TIA is useful and if you look on the Siemens Automation website (UK/Europe) the example files are growing all the time and they have some great examples that can be integrated easily in to application, I have used the ASi maintenance and monitoring example which was very well put together along with a few others. Even if you don’t use them but need some pointers on which way to go they are a good starting point.

I could list the gripes I have, but all in all its coming together nicely, just need a decent well priced Field PG to run it on £5K is a bit steep for an M4 which maybe no great improvement on the M3 which, in my opinion, wasn’t very good.

Few months ago I had a project with TIA Portal v11. Hardware targets: Simatic S7-300 and Simatic Comfort Panels.
Compared to RSLogix 5000 / FactoryTalk View for example, TIA Portal is a nightmare, especially on commissioning and start-up, when the pressure is huge and you have to work FAST.

The main problems:
1. Very slow on every operation (compiling, downloading, on-line editing, project printing/documenting).
2. Requires a very high resolution display (it is almost unusable on a 1366×768 laptop)

3. Weird behavior (HMI display alterations, crashes).